Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Andrew McCarthy article, so usually a worthwhile read -- National Review or no.

OTOH, Durham's sole indictment/conviction to date was that small-potatoes-little-turd Kevin Clinesmith, who got off with a mere slap on the wrist.

History shows that only those around the Clintons ever take the fall -- never the Clintons themselves.

1 posted on 09/18/2021 9:05:40 AM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Remember Andrew said he didn’t believe the FBI would have spied on the Trump Campaign?


2 posted on 09/18/2021 9:10:22 AM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

This is the short game after 5 years? I doubt we will live long enough to see the long gone.


3 posted on 09/18/2021 9:15:51 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Time flies like an arrow... Fruit flies like a banana )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

History is a b**ch.


5 posted on 09/18/2021 9:22:28 AM PDT by sauropod (Bidet was no prize before he put the “d” in “dementia.” - Schlichter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

I wretched when I got to National Review and projectile vomited at the sight of Andrew Mac’s name.


7 posted on 09/18/2021 9:33:01 AM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

I am out of free articles. I would never subscribe so I guess I’ll hear the rest of the story elsewhere.


8 posted on 09/18/2021 9:33:41 AM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


9 posted on 09/18/2021 9:34:55 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

Very good article. Thank you.


13 posted on 09/18/2021 9:57:50 AM PDT by TheChief2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

I think that what people are missing is the Sussman was with Perkins Coie, otherwise known as “Satans Lawyers”. These asshats are the DNC primary lawfirm. They were the same slime that invaded AZ and GA for the election fraud. If Durham is headed in Perkins Coie direction, then the road is heading right into the heart of darkness, aka the Clinton Crime Family. Haven’t lost hope in Durham.....yet.


14 posted on 09/18/2021 10:00:32 AM PDT by The MAGA-Deplorian (Democrats are lawless because Republicans are ball-less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
National Review or no.

I am a great admirer of WFB. Therefore, uh, no.

17 posted on 09/18/2021 10:28:40 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

McCarthy thinks the Durham report could be interesting reading. Well that’s nice, but I want arrests, trials and convictions. Anything less is a sham without the wow.


23 posted on 09/18/2021 2:41:16 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

Fascinating.
At the time of the events, I can think of no one who would have been interested in following the trail unless it was someone with financial resources that a special counsel would have.
I keep seeing the final scene of the old political thriller “Three Days of the Condor” in my mind.
“Who will print it?”


27 posted on 09/18/2021 3:47:44 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (I still drive under the influence of Rush Limbaugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro

Sussman made the statement to James Baker two days after a subpoena was issued for Platte River Networks records in the Hillary emails case. The conversation with Baker also occurred on the same day that Hillary IT guy Combatta was trying to delete his messages asking for help in deleting names...If I recall correctly.


29 posted on 09/18/2021 6:22:39 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: martin_fierro
To me, this seems like theater.

I agree with Dershowitz: this is a weak case.

Moreover, a D.C. jury is not going to convict a Democrat lawyer who worked for Hillary Clinton.

This is what is called a modified limited hangout.

30 posted on 09/18/2021 7:47:22 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson