How can you say that?!
Rather, according to the court’s order, the summons seeks information related to the IRS’s “investigation of an ascertainable group or class of persons” that the IRS has reasonable basis to believe “may have failed to comply with internal revenue laws.”
Aren't the police routinely allowed to enter your premises, search your personal papers, and rummage through your wife's lingerie drawer on the suspicion that some ill-defined "wrong-doing" (= "non-compliance") might be going on?
After all, you exist, and it can therefore be reasonably assumed that you may have failed - at some point in your life - to comply with at least one of the 50,000 statutes, ordinances, and requirements of the federal government's tax code.
Regards,
Which is why certain politicians seem more illegal laws against the American people. To further subjugate and eventually enslave them.
“ that the IRS has reasonable basis to believe
Yes, I noticed the “reasonable basis” the FBI had when they went to Alaska looking forward pelosi’s laptop.