Posted on 05/03/2021 2:10:53 PM PDT by ransomnote
Here's information on the video in case you want to share it with others and they don't have time to watch it. I've only made notes on the first 20 minutes of it. I hope you watch and share the entire video or my notes below.
COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]
[ransomnote: I tried to faithfully copy the names of drugs mentioned but please watch the video to check my understanding - I don't want to list the incorrect drug or formula. His protocol is recited in the first 7 minutes of the video.]
Dr. Peter McCullough has numerous qualifications, among them he is an MD, has a masters in Public Health, is a professor of medicine at Texas A&M, is actively treating Covid-19 patients, has developed protocols for succesfully treating Covid, is very broadly published (more than 1000 publications), has more than 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine (more than anyone else in his field), has won awards.
Interviewer: What has been your experience treating Covid patients. What's that like? Are you seeing success?
Notes on McCulloughs response: He redirected his entire academic career to focus on Covid-19 when it hit last year beause he saw a void. Tremendous effort in the hospital setting, all hands on deck, so Dr. McCullough directed his attention to filling the need for outpatient care.
In March 2020 he said hospitalizations and deaths are both bad endpoints - he vowed to put together a deem of doctors and they were going to figure out treatments to prevent those outcomes.
He suceeded - he put together a team of American and Italian doctors and published their first findings in the American Journal of Medicine (AJM) in 2020 that is still the most downloaded and utilized paper in all of Covid-19 articles in the AJM. And a follow up paper in 2020.
These two papers uniquely taught doctors how to treat Covid-19 as an out patient, and have been associated with the reduction of hospitalization and death by 85%. This treatment protocol is based on the premise that there won't be large randomized trials or guidelines as those take many years to develop, this is a viral infection that can be fatal, single drugs don't work, that we have to use, just like with HIV, Hepatitis C and other viral illnesses, we have to use multiple drugs in combination.
Their team found that it took 4 to 6 drugs used in combination. They leveraged small clinical trials and observational studies with a signal of benefit and acceptable safety.
Interviewer: Tell us about this protocol. You mentioned four to six drugs in combination. What drugs are those? How does it work that it's treating people, and why is this not being more broadly discussed on television or front page news. People are dying and you've got a method to help here.
Notes on McCulloughs response: It's critical to get the information out. He was invited to testify to the US Senate on November 19 and has testified before the Texas Senate , New Hampshire Sentate Colorado General Assembly.
He said governments are trying to break through the media block on this information. The American Association of Physicians And Surgeons (AAPS) publishes a home treatment guide. It's the most frequently downloaded Covid resource for Americans. It was downloaded last year over 500,000 times and used millions of times for early home treatment.
[ransomnote: Please download this free AAPS guide for treating Covid at home (PDF) and share it far and wide: CovidPatientTreatmentGuide.pdf (aapsonline.org)]
The current state of the protocol involves the following.
Indivividuals over age 50 with medical problems or younger people presenting with severe symptoms (about 1/4 of adults would need treatment) and should recieve via infusion 1) an Emergency Use Authorized monoclonal antibody. Current product on the market Regeneron (it's a combination of two products), takes about an hour to infuse and patients can go home.
After that we can start sequenced multi-drug therapy. We use 2) a nutriceutical bundle which can be helpful to everyone. Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Quercetin, Zinc -these vitamins are not curative but are thought to helpful, clearly deficiences are related to increased risks so why not? We use them.
And then after that we use 3) intracellular anti-infectives so they are combinateions. =? HydroxyChloriquine (the most widely studied intracelluslar anti-infective)
4) Doxycycline or Zithromyacin
OR 4) Ivermectin plus one of those two antibiotics (Doxycycline or Zithromyacin) (ransomnote: at 5:36 mark in the video he adds Ivermectin information. I hope I understood it correctly)
Outside the United States, there's another anti-viral approved by agencies to treat Covid-19 that's called Favipiravir that's used in Russia, Pakistan, India, Japan and elsewhere.
[ransomnote: Favipiravir: A new and emerging antiviral option in COVID-19 - ScienceDirect],
Once we cover the intra-celluslar anti-infectives:
We use inhaled 5) budesenide (randomized trial in UK, Pulmicort).
OR 5) For more severe pulmonary symptoms we use oral prednisone just like we would in asthma.
Uniquely with Covid-19, it's thrombogenic (causes blood clots) and so we use 6) a full adult aspirin for every patient. We can use more advanced blood thinners such as 6) injectable heparin or oral anticoagulants.
Lastly we have a trail-on drug we start and continue for 30 days called 7) Colchicine. This has been shown in a large trial from Canada called the Corona Trial with over 4000 patients has significant reductions in hospitalizations and deaths.
It sounds like a lot, but doctors skilled in medicine can do it. It can be done by telemedicine, and this approach has saved thousands of lives and spared millions of hospitalizations. [7 minute mark in video]
Interviewer: Do you think there have been uneccesary deaths due as a result of bad advice (gov authorities in US or other countries) If these protocols were used more broadly, could we have saved more lives.
Dr. McCullough estimates about 85% of lives lost could have been saved with what's called sequenced oral multi-drug therapy.
Interviewer: Government's plans for 3 billion dollar program promoting vaccines, what are your thoughts about the vaccines? Are they for everybody? What if you've already had Covid? What are your thoughts about this.
Dr. McCullough: Refers to his Dember 2020 paper containing the figure showing four pillars of pandemic response. If we had focused on the missing pillar, early treatment of sick patients, that would have had the highest public health value,
What happened in the United States, the health agencies developed a game plan that promoted the first pillar (contagion control) and just had the patients wait for a vaccine (pillar 4).
Physicians would have appreciated updates from public health agencies on treatments. There's been no updates on treatments: inpatient treatments, updates on treatment. We don't hear anything about sick patients. All we hear about is masking, lockdowns, and wait for a vaccine.
The vaccines are wildly promoted, far beyond any range of regulatory science. We knew the vaccines were actually being advertised on the radio before the trials were even done. We heard this on Walgreens and CVS and telephone lines. That's actually against regulatory law. Products must be FDA approved before there is any advertisement for them.
When they did come for approval, they got Emergency Use Authorization which is different from full FDA approval. EUA means it can be used, just like the monoclonal antibodies can be used, but the government is providing no assurances with respect to safety or efficacy. None.
[ransomnote: But our government is telling us they are safe and effective when by definition EUA means they are by definition NOT providing such assurances]
THe products are out there. The CDC is very clear on this - they are completely optional. No one is obligated to take these vaccines.
A great concern is that we haven't had fair balance with respect to efficacy and safety, and in fact the government can be viewed as not being a fair broker to patients with respect to information.
So the first point I'd make is in the randomized clinical trials, in both the placebo group, and the vaccine group, the attack rate of the virus was less than 1%. It's hard for any person to understand numbers below 1% (understand you're way better at under 1%). So in the first point is that over 2 months, everything is less than 1%.
So when people ask me, "Dr. McCullough, what do you think the public health impact will be?" I say, "Follow the science. It's going to be less than 1%. It was less than 1% in the clinical trials, of course it's going to be less than 1% in practice." [11:11 minute mark in the video]
The next question he is asked is, "Do you think the vaccines will prevent the disease?". He says that in the trials the vaccine was reported to be 90% effective, but we knew in the trials the patients were 'unblinded'.
Trial participants knew if they got the vaccine or not based on the high rate of vaccine reactions in the arm where it's injected (about 80% rate) and so for that reason far fewer patients even came forward with suspected infections in the vaccine arm because they felt that they were protected.
So what we see now in real world data, (e.g., Denmark and trials elsewhere larger than the original mRNA trials) is that the vaccine is about 70% -90% and those for the adnoviral vaccines (J&J, Astrazeneca, currently paused or off most markets) is closer to 60% to 70%. That's not bad - the influenza vaccine is about 30% to 40% effective.
I wouldn't want anyone to get the Covid-19 vaccine and think they are protected.
Interviewer: VAERS. What are your thoughts on the risks. Are they being downplayed? DO you feel patients are getting true informed consent?
Dr. McCullough: FDA when it evaluates drug products or other biologic products - there are two assessments of causality. One is by the local doctor and the other is by the sponsor or drug manufacturer. The FDA does not opine on causality (FDA doesn't opine on whether a death was due to a product).
A typical new drug, after 5 deaths, would get a black box warning. Your listeners would see that on TV, "May cause death...."
At about 50 deaths for a new product, it's pulled off the market.
We do have some precedent for vaccines. In the 1976 swine flu pandemic, we attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans. There were 500 cases of Guianne Barre syndrome (ascending paralysis) and 25 deaths. The program was killed at 25 deaths.
We know annually the influenze vaccines (multiple manufacturers), 195 million people vaccinated about 20 to 30 deaths are reported through VAERS.
In the US today, we have approximately 77 million individuals fully vaccinated for Covid and we have 2602 deaths.
[ransomnote: at the time of this writing, COVID DATA - OpenVaers states a total of 3544 deaths]
So it's unprecedented how many deaths have accrued. Previous studies indicate only 1% to 10% of adverse events following vaccination are ever reported to VAERS]
[ransomnote: the CDC is behind in publishing VAERS data for reports received for Covid-19 vaccines. Certainly less than 20% of received reports have been published by the CDC for this vaccine, so actual reported deaths and other adverse events are underreported.]
Most of the deaths occur on days 1, 2 and 3 (some in the vaccination clinics) and are often reported by nursing staff etc. On March 8, the CDC announced with little fanfare it had reviewed about 1600 deaths with unnamed FDA doctors and they indicated not a single death was related to the vaccine.
That was concerning in the academic community. I have chaired and participated in dozens of safety monitoring boards and critical endpoint committees, and I can tell you based on my experience that kind of work would have taken many months to review all the laboratories, the death certificates, and all the circumstances.
It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any experience with Covid-19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccines, so I think this was effectively a scrubbing, like we've seen elsewhere.
There is a 'Trusted News Initiative', which is very important for Americans to understand. It was announced Dedember 10. This was a coalition of all the major media and government stake holders in vaccination, where they are not going to allow any negative information on vaccines to get into the popular media because they are concerned about 'vaccine hesitancy.'
That if Americans got any type of fair balance on safety events they simply wouldn't come forward voluntarily and get the vaccine. So the Trusted News Intiative is really troublesome because we're now at record numbers of deaths, they continue to occur every day.
My professional opinion was that the J&J were the safest but they were pulled for blood clots, and estimates for the mRNA vaccines are that they probably have 30 times that J&J number, and they're still going strong.
A lot of Americans don't understand how tight these stakeholders are. Keep in mind the National Institute of Health (NIH) is a co-owner of the Moderna patent so they have a vested financial interest in keeping these vaccines going.
The United States government has made a decicion, along with the stake holders, CDC/NIH/FDA/Big Pharma/Bill Gates/World Health Organization - they have made a committment to mass vaccination as a solution to the Covid-19 pandemic, and we are really going to be witness to what's going to happen in history.
We sitting right now the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there's been tens of thousands of hospitalizations all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong.
Interviewer: When doctors raise concerns, our content is pulled down, given strikes. You'd think a doctor could offer their medical expertise without being censored by Silicon Valley. What is the way forward, in your opinion. (gives examples of masking, 'time will be measured before COVid and After Covid).
Dr. McCullough: I think what's going to happen is that sooner or later, we will recognize that Covid-19 is like any other respiratory illness. It's like the flu, pneumococcol pneumonia, staphilococcol pneumonia.
That in fact, we are going to recognize it, treat it as an outpatient, and we're going to keep things under control. Fortunately in the US, early treatment did kick in, in the 4th quarter of 2020, we saw simulataneous, marked reductions in new cases, hospitalizations, and death. The only thing that can do that is early treatment.
Early treatment markedly reduces spread because it reduces the contagious time from about 2 weeks to about 4 days, and allows someone to be treated at home so they don't go spread it and get hospitalized.
At my hospital, we would typically have 125 to 200 cases. Right now we have about 25. I mean, it's wonderful. We're at a plateau in the United States. Right now we have 45 to 60 thousand new cases per day. Now that's inflated because the lab numbers are inflated because they include positives from asymptomatic testing.
It's important for people to understand, when we do asymptomatic testing, the vast majority of those are FALSE positives, they are not real cases. The tests were never FDA cleared for asymptomatic testing. In fact my view on this, it should be banned. We should stop testing athletes and tormenting people when they travel with asymptomatic tests.
The tests were only FDA cleared (not approved) for acutely sick people.
But I think we should just recognize that it's (Covid) is going to be here. [ransomnote: Stopping at the 20:22 minute mark in the video. There's another 10 minutes to the video which I will transcribe later. He does say if you've had Covid, you have immunity for an average of 17 years and is against vaccinating those who have already had Covid]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33051876/
Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2-infected cells express the Spike protein (S) at their surface and fuse with ACE2-positive neighboring cells. Expression of S without any other viral proteins triggers syncytia formation.
= = = = = = =
Hey gas_dr, right up your alley. They’re looking at the lungs.
Hmmm, what happens with an mRNA jab which tells cells to start expressing spike proteins? Luck of the draw as to which cells take in the lipid coating or adenovirus?
It was just discovered that the earth is even flatter than we suspected.
And the fact that people are WILLINGLY and HAPPILY taking the heathen Chinee mystery potion into their blood stream.
:-)
#GassyNotClassyNeedsNewMaterial
(h/t Fractal Trader)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3956315/posts
“What did happen, is someone slapped a grossly misleading headline on a video, and then posted it on an anti-vax blog...Par for the course at this point.”
Truth. I don’t see how anyone can actually LISTEN to Dr. McCullough and think “Kook!”
In the video he answered a question I’ve had, and that most others pretend not to know the answer to: Having already been “Covid confirmed”, do I have immunity?”
Answer, yes and much more than anyone vaxxed. 17 years of general immunity, not one tied to a specific spike. Where’s my Golden Passport haters???
And another, “Having had Covid do I need the vaxxine?”
NO.
Thanks, Doc!
This Israel info ties into what the article/report roving linked to, yesterday....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.