Ping
ExcellentโฆIโm going to ask my wife to hang out with her not-yet-vaccinated friends more.
What are the adverse events in question here?
Are they referring to an adverse event to the study?
Exposure by a study participant to an infected person, prior to 30 days after the second dose, would be an adverse event to the study.
Read the exposure(s) during pregnancy (EDP), on page 68.
Freaky.
-PJ
Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF....
>>Interesting.<<
And, this....
7.2. Participant Discontinuation/Withdrawal From the Study
A participant may withdraw from the study at any time at his/her own request. Reasons for discontinuation from the study may include the following:
โข Refused further follow-up;
โข Lost to follow-up;
โข Death...... WELL, yeah. Hope they’re allowed to withdraw, then. ๐๐
Vax Covidians are spreaders!! ๐๐๐
This is grist for the mill.
Side effects aside, the *real* numbers simply do not justify an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine for this virus.
Yes, some people do die of the virus. Welcome to the real world.
I read this elsewhere,
Those whom are vaxxer
are new spreaders.
.
Chinas first Strike
Continues,,,
we’re due to take my crazy MIL , age 91, for her second shot....are we in danger?....how does this vaccine effect get transmitted?...air?
Sorry of that deflates your fun balloon.
Evil madman Bill Gates Depopulation link
https://youtu.be/SF6Ev_EXg9w
Just More Confusion
about Wuhan Flu.
When I was reading an article about shingles being reported as a “adverse event” from the vaccines there were some reports of unvaccinated people who had close contact with a vaccinated person getting shingles.
Of course that seemed highly unlikely to be connected. Shingles are a result of a latent herpes virus becoming active due to some kind of stress. But, someone posted a part of the Pfizer vax EMA submission where Pfizer listed inhalation or contact with the vax as a possible source of vax exposure.
Then I remembered the following news story from early March that I had posted here. I initially found it bizarre, too and even wondered if it might just be a result of a poor google translation of Hebrew to English...:-) But, it was real...they did mean “vaccinators”, not vaccine recipients.
“This is from a news report from March 8, 2021
The Israeli Ministry of Health has decided to investigate the effects of pericarditis among vaccinated people. The decision was made after reports of a number of infections in the membrane and heart muscle were discovered among vaccinators.โ
โYesterday (Wednesday) a meeting was held between officials in the hospitals and the Ministry of Health during which these phenomena were reported by some of the hospitals. In a directive sent to the administers of the hospitals by the Ministry they were asked to forward, as stated, a report of every incident of myocarditis discovered among the vaccinated and to forward the referral to the cardiology department of the hospital.โ
So the vaccinated sheep are going to kill the vaccine hesitancy crowd aka flyover country conservatives?
So what are these, Gain of Function Vaccines?
Pretty clever I suppose.
Iโm worried about ever needing a blood transfusion-and getting blood from someone vaccinated with one of the mRNA vaccines