Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gopher Broke

What is her reason? Is it legislative procedural where she thinks the bill as written will be declared unconstitutional? Her veto seems so out of character to her


12 posted on 03/29/2021 1:47:40 PM PDT by llevrok (I'm old enough to remember when the quarantine was to be 2 weeks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: llevrok
said, "What is her reason?"

This is what Noem is supporting
https://www.defendtitleixnow.com/
The undersigned agree that Title IX needs to be protected, and we commit to working together to keep fairness in women’s sports.
We believe:
1) Only girls should play girls’ sports. Title IX was passed to protect fairness for women.
2) The federal government should enforce Title IX in a way that protects fairness for women’s sports, rather than misusing it in a way that undermines fairness.
3) The NCAA and other athletic sanctioning bodies should not take any adverse action against any state or school that acts to protect fairness for women.

It seems it's similar to the South Carolina Gov reaction which is to not change coed sports. I don't have an issue with that.

103 posted on 03/29/2021 4:16:35 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson