[Peter ODonnell]

Evidently it was Prince Charles asking, since “senior royals not the Queen or Prince Philip” narrows down to about one or two candidates.

If so, I pick Meghan Markle because Prince Charles is even more loathsome. She’s obviously a high maintenance person that many would dismiss as a phoney, but even so, the Royal family have blown the chance to use her to their advantage as a demonstration of their inclusiveness. Seeing as how they are nominally at the head of a vast commonwealth of multi-ethnic nations around the world, that might have been a smart play you would have thought.

Smart and Prince Charles are not words one often finds in the same sentence.

[psjones]

The woman obviously had no interest in assimilating to
the royal lifestyle...Notice she did not even bother to
show up for the state dinner that was held when Trump went to London..The royal family tries to be apolitical, for obvious reasons, but Megan, like the typical liberal, wanted to be able to spout off on politics....She is a liar, made claims that could be disproven...Now, she and Harry have proven that they could never be trusted.

[DiogenesLamp]

She’s obviously a high maintenance person that many would dismiss as a phoney, but even so, the Royal family have blown the chance to use her to their advantage as a demonstration of their inclusiveness.

I have long thought that the only reason Harry got involved with the ugly and obnoxious bitch was to use her to demonstrate royal "Diversity."

He certainly couldn't have been attracted to her for her looks or personality, so I think it was deliberately engineered "diversity."