Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle may lose royal titles over Oprah interview
NY Post ^ | March 7, 2021 | Lee Brown

Posted on 03/07/2021 12:24:58 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: irishjuggler

no way! Diana would have been all in for this Halfrican addition to the firm.


61 posted on 03/07/2021 2:07:09 PM PST by ronniesgal (Hillary wants to be Governor of New York!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Since Hollywood has run out of ideas, how about a sitcom called “Trash and the Pedigreed Train Wreck” about a floozy voiceover actress socialite-wannabe who marries into the royal family and hilarity ensues with their comic antics each week as their abrasive personalities clash with decorum and tradition.


62 posted on 03/07/2021 2:10:11 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; All
Meghan and Harry will appear on a 90 minute CBS interview tonight at 8 PM EST.

Leni/MinuteGal

63 posted on 03/07/2021 2:13:05 PM PST by MinuteGal (MAGA !!! MAGA !!! MAGA !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

When I was young I had this romantic attachment to the monarchy. Then I lived through the 80’s. The queen is a paragon of devotion to duty. Philips ok, though an infamous jerk. But Charles, Camilla, Diana, Andrew, Fergie, and now Harry and Megan are just eurotrash, or imported American-trash in the case of the latter


64 posted on 03/07/2021 2:18:43 PM PST by j.havenfarm (20 years on Free Republic, 12/10/20! More than 3700 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

Well, it’s an unwinnable debate at this point. Di was her own brand of but nuts, but most women I’ve known aren’t thrilled with sons marrying older women. It may be an element of feeling like an older woman is competing for the maternal role. Or it may be a simple biological instinct that a woman whose peak fertility years are past isn’t the ideal vehicle for perpetuating the family genes.


65 posted on 03/07/2021 2:19:11 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

Unless something happens like in the movie King Ralph, Harry and the Ho stand no chance of seeing the throne.


66 posted on 03/07/2021 2:19:29 PM PST by EvilCapitalist (We must FIGHT, I repeat it sir, we must FIGHT! -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: David Chase

Now, what American would vote for her for anything? Oh, wait a minute....I just thought about some current officeholders, so I’ll take that back.


67 posted on 03/07/2021 2:26:12 PM PST by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: psjones

that Meghan is not exactly ‘genius’ material is she? like doing ‘Oprah’ is the level the royals live on. hardly! she seems to have wanted the cache of being royalty and the fame and hangers-on it brought - but also wanted characteristics of the Hollywood lifestyle - p r agents and tv interviews, flashy designer wardrobe, elitist woke opinions . like those 2 could ever co-exist. she could dress the part and smile the part - but ultimately was lacking the 2 important elements: dignity and dedication to service to Britain/the Commonwealth.


68 posted on 03/07/2021 2:27:47 PM PST by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The Royal family couldn’t have hooked him up with something better than this? Was all the princesses in Denmark and Sweden already spoken for?


69 posted on 03/07/2021 2:31:06 PM PST by IgnorerOfLiberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

That will really frost Me-gains pumpkin. Without that title she is back to being just a two bit actress again.
Not what this gold-digging, social climbing chickie wanted. Harry may be toast very very soon.
Me-gain really miscalculated when she thought she could out-smart Her Majesty.


70 posted on 03/07/2021 2:38:28 PM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Chase

Hmmmmm. . .so he can become the new king of Scotland since Idi Amin is gone. . . .

Sounds like a plan to me


71 posted on 03/07/2021 2:39:16 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blurb2350

What they forfeited was the right to be addressed as “Your Royal Highness”. They were still a duke and duchess. Until tomorrow. We’ll see.
Look for Her Majesty to give Kate another honor of some sort, just to make Me-gain fume.


72 posted on 03/07/2021 2:42:29 PM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Osagegirl

You can be sure DNA tests were done immediately at his birth


73 posted on 03/07/2021 2:46:44 PM PST by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Meghan became a princess of the United Kingdom upon her marriage to Prince Harry. Officially, she is known as Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex, Countess of Dumbarton and Lady Kilkeel, but she has elected not to use the style of Her Royal Highness.

She is a princess by marriage, which means that she is not in the line of succession.

Part of the Mexit agreement was that Harry and she would not use the “Royal Highness” styles, but they would be allowed to keep their style and titles.

However, the Oprah interview might be seen as breaking the Mexit agreement.


74 posted on 03/07/2021 2:47:03 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

We don’t F-ing care.


75 posted on 03/07/2021 2:56:43 PM PST by lefty-lie-spy (Stay Metal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet
This no talent, hack actress just took Harry’s life to the dumpster. I hope they enjoy the rest of their lives as D list celebs in California!

I don't know about that. Her performance as Presenter #24 in "Deal or No Deal" is noteworthy in its subtlety and layers of expression. Who could forget it? At very least her performance was at times head and shoulders above Presenter #3 and Presenter #21.


76 posted on 03/07/2021 3:01:27 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I don’t think Wallace Simpson (the divorcee who married Edward VIII) ever got a royal title. While he was allowed to serve some minor positions as Duke, I don’t beleive she ever was.


77 posted on 03/07/2021 3:01:46 PM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MagUSNRET

I like your tagline :)


78 posted on 03/07/2021 3:02:15 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

Harry Hewitt is a bastard... not related to the Windors


79 posted on 03/07/2021 3:08:13 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Pretty sure the former Edward VIII and Wallis were referred to as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.


80 posted on 03/07/2021 3:11:49 PM PST by Bigg Red (Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson