Skip to comments.
Largest randomized controlled trial of masks fails to show a significant difference in infection rates
Twitter ^
| Nov 18
| Covif19Crusher
Posted on 11/18/2020 10:21:47 AM PST by RandFan
The largest randomized controlled trial of masks ever (n=6,000) from Denmark fails to show a statistically significant difference in infection rates.
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: chinavirusinfo; coroanvirus; covid19; facemasks; masks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: ConstitutionandFreedom
So wearing a mask is only 50% effective?
To: eyeamok
42
posted on
11/18/2020 5:38:47 PM PST
by
politicianslie
(I took HCQ+Zn on the 3rd day of symptoms. HCQ+Zn is a grand slam home run CURE!)
To: cherry
you could dinghies and. y covering your cough with a sleeve, kleenex or handkerchief
43
posted on
11/18/2020 5:44:16 PM PST
by
Mom MD
To: Mom MD
wow. you could do the same by.... fat fingers and little keyboard
44
posted on
11/18/2020 5:45:35 PM PST
by
Mom MD
To: bigbob
I dunno, if it’s real science doesn’t it have to come from someone with a journalism degree?Good one!
45
posted on
11/18/2020 5:47:30 PM PST
by
faux_hog
To: RandFan
46
posted on
11/18/2020 9:36:03 PM PST
by
WhattheDickens?
(Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
To: volunbeer
At this point, anyone in public coughing or sneezing should wear a mask. Anyone who is exhibiting these symptoms should not be in public anyways.
Well that's about as dumb as the mask mandates themselves. If someone coughs because they breathed in when they meant to drink, if someone has seasonal allergies or is allergic to a nearby cat or something, you seriously think they should be staying at home for what, two weeks? No one has ever stayed home simply because of a cough or a sneeze. What is different now? Besides the fear factor, what is actually, physically, different?
To: MinorityRepublican
So wearing a mask is only 50% effective?
A typical N95 mask is usually only about 20% effective in filtering particles around larger viral sizes. With proper seal, decon procedures, wearing habits, biohazard disposal, consistent replacement, and so on, the masks are up to 97-8% effective. But that's a pipe dream, and nothing close to realistic.
To: Svartalfiar; volunbeer
At this point, anyone in public coughing or sneezing should wear a mask.The China Virus is easily treated with safe, approved drugs. Thousands of COVID-19 infected patients have been cured with a success rate approaching 100%.
It's NOT a pandemic, it's always been a scam because it can be easily treated.
At this point, if you don't already know where to go to get a prescription should you loose smell and taste, then count yourself a fool who might die because of your ignorance.
I used one of the doctors shown when I lost my smell and taste. It is really quite dramatic, I could hold a can of kitten food just inches from my nose and I could barely smell it. You have FIVE days of symptoms to get treated w/ the Zelenko Protocol, or you can hide in your basement and wait for test results.
49
posted on
11/25/2020 7:22:06 PM PST
by
politicianslie
(I took HCQ+Zn on the 3rd day of symptoms. HCQ+Zn is a grand slam home run CURE!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson