Posted on 10/17/2020 11:25:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
When teaching children to appreciate art it is important to encourage them to identify one aspect of a piece they find pleasing or distasteful.Art is about connecting good or bad.
You will see such marvels as a scrap piece of plywood, with screws in it, and twine entitled “Constructing the Letter “H”.
My rule of thumb is, "If it's something even I could make, it ain't art." Since I can at least draw stick figures, I'd say that puts me one up on "modern artists".
Because nothing new has happened in architecture in the last 100 years or so.
The ugliness, brutality, and emptiness are a reflection of the moral relativism that dominates the “Arts”.
Modern architecture is done with Computer Aided Design. Computers are great for angles more than for curves. I postulate that architects who use CAD to design buildings are not as good at architecture that is drawn with pencil.
As far as government buildings, everyone knows that designs are chosen based on factors not necessarily including architectural skill. Such factors would include things like family relationships, political contributions, favors granted or owed, and some others that have nothing whatsoever to do with ability.
Some modern architecture looks nice and inviting - windows that let in a lot of natural light and an interesting use of geometric shapes. But some of it is ugly and does not seem accommodating to the people who will use the building. I also think it is pointless to make a modern building that looks like an ancient Greek temple. I guess I don’t like either extreme.
Both those buildings are butt ugly
The painting of Obama is funny and mildly alarming - he looks like he is about to be engulfed by the plants all around him.
Yes. Novelty for the sake of novelty is a cancer. It affects all the visual arts. It afflicts music. And it has infected the humanities and social sciences in academia, where it is boosted by the publish or perish syndrome. In mature fields, it is difficult to impossible to find a truly new insight, and one eventually reaches limits on how many years one can spend researching in a desperate attempt to find a new source worthy of being explored. The goal should be to develop erudition and a profound appreciation for a classical canon, and to become a worthy teacher and guide. Instead, we see graduate students and young academics flocking to garbage studies to do something new and, they think, transgressive.
How hard is it to place a crucifix into a jar of urine? Most people would never do that but an artist would.
One time my wife had a college assignment to visit an art museum. One room was dominated by 4 giant styrofoam boards 20 feet by 3 feet by 3 feet, arranged in a large square. As we were reviewing the museum guide a security guard came over and asked us not to sit on the artwork. Somebody got paid for arranging 4 huge pieces of styrofoam and calling it “sandwich”.
Not all modernist (or post-modernist) buildings are like that.
And open floor plans suck.
But ... tell us how you really feel ;-)
Agreed with what you said.
Considering what that houses, the architecture is fitting.
Amen.
But is FLW still considered modern?
I love his homes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.