Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fatima
Re: Q #4803;

Oh, snap. I twatted that video.....

Lemme go delete it.


1,137 posted on 10/01/2020 10:30:10 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1134 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
Re Q #4804;

(excerpt from link)

Thursday, October 1, 2020

United States Obtains Final Judgement and Permanent Injunction Against Edward Snowden

On Sept. 29, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia entered a final judgement and permanent injunction against Edward Snowden, a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA).

In September 2019, the United States filed a lawsuit against Snowden, who published a book entitled Permanent Record in violation of the non-disclosure agreements he signed with both CIA and NSA.

The lawsuit alleged that Snowden published his book without submitting it to the agencies for pre-publication review, in violation of his express obligations under the agreements he signed. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that Snowden has given public speeches on intelligence-related matters, also in violation of his non-disclosure agreements.

The United States’ lawsuit did not seek to stop or restrict the publication or distribution of Permanent Record. Rather, under well-established Supreme Court precedent, Snepp v. United States, the government sought to recover all proceeds earned by Snowden because of his failure to submit his publication for pre-publication review in violation of his alleged contractual and fiduciary obligations.

In December 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, found in favor of the United States in the suit against Snowden on the issue of liability and held that Snowden breached his contractual and fiduciary obligations to the CIA and NSA by publishing Permanent Record and giving prepared remarks within the scope of his pre-publication review obligations, but reserved judgment on the scope of these violations or the remedies due to the government.

On Tuesday, the court entered judgment in the government’s favor in an amount exceeding $5.2 million and imposed a constructive trust for the benefit of the United States over those sums and any further monies, royalties, or other financial advantages derived by Snowden from Permanent Record and 56 specific speeches.


1,141 posted on 10/01/2020 10:35:30 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1137 | View Replies ]

To: fatima
Re: Q #4803;

Oh, snap. I twatted that video.....Lemme go delete it.

Okay, I went to delete that Epstein cell video that I had retweeted, and its gone *POOF*.

Musta got zapped at the source.


1,143 posted on 10/01/2020 10:38:09 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson