To: BenLurkin
No mention of the fact that this would have to be an
endothermic process - i.e., require the
input of energy.
Regards,
4 posted on
09/20/2020 10:08:25 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: alexander_busek
5 posted on
09/20/2020 10:20:16 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: alexander_busek
Aw, but it’s “efficient”. They just don’t say what it is efficient compared to.
10 posted on
09/20/2020 11:47:05 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: alexander_busek
Endothermic — so build lots of coal plants. You get the CO2 feedstock AND the required energy. Coal —> polyethylene.
23 posted on
09/21/2020 5:41:33 AM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
("And oft conducted by historic truth, We tread the long extent of backward time.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson