1. She has worked WITH the group in question, not FOR the group.
2. The question is not who the group is supported by. The only question is the scientific validity of the study she has been a part of.
3. Such studies need to be judged on their own scientific merits, It should not matter who the “messenger” is.
4. The media is trying to denigrate the study and any report on it, merely because some connection to Bannon, and never looking at whether the study has scientific validity.