To: BlackAdderess
Anonymous accusers were allowedThe Inquisition court provided a lawyer to defend the accused, the accused was allowed to make a list of his enemies, those thus listed could not testify against the accused. This did not occur during the French Revolution. The two are quite dissimilar.
34 posted on
07/14/2020 1:54:27 PM PDT by
pbear8
(the Lord is my light and my salvation)
To: pbear8
No. The accused were not allowed lawyers.
35 posted on
07/14/2020 2:05:29 PM PDT by
BlackAdderess
(The GOP needs to pick another color. It is a matter of time before the Dems will want red back)
To: pbear8
They were also “allowed to list” people early on but if the officials had any suspicion they were lying they were “encouraged” to do so under torture.
36 posted on
07/14/2020 2:07:27 PM PDT by
BlackAdderess
(The GOP needs to pick another color. It is a matter of time before the Dems will want red back)
To: pbear8
The accused were also generally uneducated, the questioners otoh were educated.
Plus as I pointed out, you don’t have ANY globalist elites heads rolling in this.
37 posted on
07/14/2020 2:11:07 PM PDT by
BlackAdderess
(The GOP needs to pick another color. It is a matter of time before the Dems will want red back)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson