Replies

I do believe the POTUS wants us to demonstrate our capacity to stand on our own two feet and push back on illegal, oppressive actions.

As we enter the final phases of The Storm, military planning demands that all options be covered, even the idea that we could be without our president at some point. If we have put the Deep Staters in their place, we will be in 188% better position to defend ourselves during that period of time than if we are under their boot. Think what the Deep State governors/mayors would do to a cowed public if President Trump were somehow removed. Now think what would happen if the public had taken control back. BETTER OUTCOME!

It's only natural to plan for all eventualities. Lawsuits and other ways to cut the abuses of power by the Governors/mayors; protests that practice social distancing; recall tallies (long before the elections) going up, up, up; call-in to the governor's office letting those lying thieves/dictators know just how we feel about them; demanding our freedom will put is in MUCH better position for the final phases of the storm, and for that day in the future when we KNOW president Trump will no longer be in office.

AnonTitle: Governors Are Not Immune to Lawsuits Arising Out of Willful or Negligent Disregard of State Laws

4529

Q!!Hs1Jq13jV6 26 Jun 2020 - 1:02:11 PM

https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1276589294010982401 📁
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials 📁
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Q

I do believe the POTUS wants us to demonstrate our capacity to stand on our own two feet and push back on illegal, oppressive actions.

I totally agree. I do have a question however, why do you think people are so afraid of doing something so simple as taking off the stupid masks en mass? At the Trump rally there were pretty much no masks on, and no social distancing. I don’t believe POTUS would put us in harms way, so why are people complying?