Posted on 05/28/2020 11:36:48 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19
“You keep doing homework. I’ve got 41 years on your homework. Have a good day.”
Apparently none of it related to electric propulsion?
A PT6 is 275 lbs. The electric motor is 300 lbs and you still have the battery weight. I don’t see the savings.
“A PT6 is 275 lbs. The electric motor is 300 lbs and you still have the battery weight. I don’t see the savings.”
I found 300 for turbine and 297 for electric. Basically a wash.
There is no weight savings. Never said there was. What I posted was that they size the battery based on the max fuel capacity.
Battery weight = Fuel weight
Battery position is same as fuel tanks
Electric weight = turbine weight
Electric position = Turbine position
Keeps certs and calcs close
“A PT6 is 275 lbs. The electric motor is 300 lbs and you still have the battery weight. I don’t see the savings.”
300# savings comparing electric to Beaver radial!
Then a PT6 would be 325 lbs savings plus half the battery weight for three times the range. Aren’t you tired of this back and forth? This is not about a performance contest. It’s no contest. This is about claiming ‘green-niss’
“Then a PT6 would be 325 lbs savings “
Could you factor in fuel, maintenance and overhaul costs pt6 versus electric?
“Then a PT6 “
Who is going to deliver the fuel to the seaplanes?
“It’s no contest”
$150 per hour versus $15 per hour fuel costs.
No contest.
“. Aren’t you tired of this back and forth?”
Nope. I learn a lot.
Not only that, if you don't use your cell phone too much, you can use the excess to run your Tesla.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.