Also, note the 2nd highlight..If there is no investigation, how did these get approved?
And mosy importantly, they couldn't have known there were intelligence reports about Flynn until his name got unmasked .
#Flynn Declassified “unmasking” docs state “While the principals are identified below, we cannot confirm they saw the unmasked information” Biden campaign statement to @CBSNews does not address head on but says the docs “simply indicate breadth and depth of concern” pic.twitter.com/7eFF9ECIPm— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) May 14, 2020
the docs “simply indicate breadth and depth of concern”
About WHAT? And WHY? Given this activity before the supposedly dubious + setup phone call with the Ambassador.
Of course that’s a rhetorical question ;)
scratchin my head...Catherine, don’t let them control the dialogue.
Don’t let them narrow the focus to Flynn only. (hating unnamed sources but...)
“Samantha Power, the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, was ‘unmasking’ at such a rapid pace in the final months of the Obama administration that she averaged more than one request for every working day in 2016 – and even sought information in the days leading up to President Trump’s inauguration, multiple sources close to the matter told Fox News.
Two sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said the requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking, exceeded 260 last year. One source indicated this occurred in the final days of the Obama White House.”
I’m so far behind, and some other person has probably said this better than I could, but how many of those people doing the unmasking were actually, legally able to do so? One was an ambassador, what possible legal reason would she have to involve herself in the Flynn case?