Like being and acting nervous, defensive, or scared when an unknown person points a gun at gun at you?
Jumping to judgement here, in the media, or anywhere is an assault on justice. What is needed is a solid investigation. From there let the chips fall where they may.
As an aside, for some people it’s not that bloody hard to tell that gun owners, conservatives, or pro life advocates are up to no good.
I suspect you would support an investigation if a member of one of those groups were shot in the street because someone thought they did something wrong and reacted when a gun was pointed at them.
The amount of pre judging on this issue, especially here is somewhat disgusting.
“Like being and acting nervous, defensive, or scared when an unknown person points a gun at gun at you?”
No, like skulking around casing a neighborhood with that characteristic “I’m a badass criminal” attitude, when the criminal thinks no one is watching. What are you, thirteen, or a woketard?
“Jumping to judgement here, in the media, or anywhere is an assault on justice. What is needed is a solid investigation.”
Road apples. There’s enough evidence here to prove that there’s no need for further investigation a hundred times over. We have got to stop catering to the race-hustling poverty pimps who jump up yelling “racism” every time a black criminal is thwarted in the commission of another crime.
This nonsense, based as it is on falsehood alone, is and has been costing the United States dearly—both in terms of our hard-earned tax dollars, and in terms of social cohesion. Perhaps we need a Constitutional amendment: “White people are allowed to protect their persons and property, even against Negroes.”
We have three percent of the population committing 50%—that’s half—of all the murders, and every time a member of that three percent is stopped from committing another one, we have to pretend that the only reason he was stopped is white racism.
“As an aside, for some people it’s not that bloody hard to tell that gun owners, conservatives, or pro life advocates are up to no good.”
That kind of idiocy drives me up the wall. Firstly, you’re putting good and evil on the same moral plane. Secondly, you’re implying that gun owners, conservatives, and pro-life advocates are frequently up to no good, which is caca del toro. Thirdly, you’re implying that people who disapprove of gun owners, conservatives, or pro-life advocates have a moral right to a voice in our government, which they don’t.
“I suspect you would support an investigation if a member of one of those groups were shot in the street because someone thought they did something wrong and reacted when a gun was pointed at them.”
Your writing here is incomprehensible. I’m betting, though, that whatever you “suspect” is as false as it is insulting.
“The amount of pre judging on this issue, especially here is somewhat disgusting.”
Pre-judging my fat, American ass. Read the letter from the district attorney, then go down and shove your ignorant tripe in *his* face.