Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders Sanders, others to be reinstated to New York primary ballot (election in June)
The Hill ^ | 5/05/20 | Tal Axelrod

Posted on 05/05/2020 5:22:54 PM PDT by Libloather

A federal judge issued a ruling Tuesday requiring New York to hold its presidential primary in June and restore Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and other former presidential contenders to the ballot.

The ruling from Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York, an Obama appointee, said that Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) decision to scrap his state’s primary violated the First and 14th Amendment rights of White House contenders who have since ended their campaigns.

“The Court concludes that Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors have shown a clear and substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that the Democratic Commissioners’ April 27 Resolution removing Yang, Sanders, and eight other Democratic presidential candidates from the ballot deprived them of associational rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution,” Torres ruled, referring to entrepreneur Andrew Yang, another former presidential candidate who filed the lawsuit against New York.

Cuomo first announced in April that he was cancelling New York’s presidential primary after Sanders dropped out of the race and essentially locked up Biden’s claim to the Democratic nomination. Still, Sanders had declared that he planned on remaining on upcoming primary ballots to win more delegates, who can work to influence the party’s platform at this summer’s Democratic National Convention.

“We shouldn’t have nonessential primaries. There is only one candidate who is running,” New York Democratic Party Chairman Jay Jacobs said at the time.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: analisatorres; ballot; biden; judiciary; ny; obamajudge; sanders; sdnewyork
Someone really should wake up Gropin' Joe and tell him.
1 posted on 05/05/2020 5:22:54 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Who was the plantiff?


2 posted on 05/05/2020 5:25:24 PM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yay!! Finally some GOOD NEWS from New York.


3 posted on 05/05/2020 5:28:17 PM PDT by House Atreides (It is not a HOAX but it IS CERTAINLY A PRETEXT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Actually, the decision is probably to his advantage, him being the only remaining active candidate. Once he wins, he’ll have a group of genuinely elected delegates, making it that much the harder to oust him.


4 posted on 05/05/2020 7:10:01 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

How so?


5 posted on 05/05/2020 8:00:24 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Yang, I think.


6 posted on 05/05/2020 8:08:51 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“We shouldn’t have nonessential primaries. There is only one candidate who is running,” New York Democratic Party Chairman Jay Jacobs said at the time.

Democrats oppose democracy.


7 posted on 05/05/2020 8:09:27 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m confused. What does the First or Fourteenth Amendments have to do with primary voting? Hell, the STATES shouldn’t even be involved in the primaries, much less the FedGov!


8 posted on 05/05/2020 8:29:50 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Yang and Sanders both.

Up yours, DNC. Ditto for your lapdog, Cuomo.


9 posted on 05/06/2020 3:22:29 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

See Section 2 of the 14th Amendment. I’m no lawyer, but I think that’s what applies here.


10 posted on 05/06/2020 3:25:39 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

If the delegates just went to him by default, there wouldn’t be an official declaration that he’d actually won them. If he wins them in an election, he’s won them. Same thing holds for the remaining primaries, until he’s up to a majority. At that point it’s going to be very hard for the Democrat leadership to change candidates, much harder than if the delegates were just his by default and the leadership could fool with them.


11 posted on 05/06/2020 6:24:16 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
See Section 2 of the 14th Amendment. I’m no lawyer, but I think that’s what applies here.

But why would it apply? This isn't an election - it's a primary. The government shouldn't be involved whatsoever, a primary is (should be) 100% a party-run thing. The only involvement from government should be giving the parties the option to use public property (libraries, police stations, schools) as a polling location.

Really, the parties should be much more restrictive - there should be no open voting in a primary, and if I was in charge of one, it would be limited to voters who were registered for at least a year or so. Likely give double votes to people who are actively involved in the party, as opposed to random people coming off the street.

Also, primary priority would be formulated based on party loyalty - States with the most Repubs in State/FedGov, Repub Govs, etc would do their primaries first. Then Iowa can go in the middle of the pack, and screw putting corn in my gas tank. But this gets into much wider fixes needed than what this article/conversation is about :p
12 posted on 05/06/2020 8:31:44 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson