Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, epidemiology. No measure of “velocity”. Because every epidemic ever studied was retrospective. Now we desperately need a measure of velocity and not one with a lot of initegrals and Sigmas. The truest indicator I can think of is how many days until the number of dead each day doubles. That’s what I am watching.


12 posted on 03/19/2020 7:58:22 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

This graph shows three cases: r0 = 0.9, R0 = 1.0, and R0 = 1.1. You can see that R0=1 is the magic number: if R0 is less than 1, the epidemic is dying out.

If we want to control an epidemic, then, what we need to do is reduce R0. We can do that by changing any of the three parameters of transmissibility, contact, and duration.


14 posted on 03/19/2020 8:00:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson