Always interesting doins in the digs...
1 posted on
02/19/2020 3:40:46 AM PST by
Adder
To: Adder
There will be a Star Trek picture on this thread by noon.
I’ve been on this board a long time.
I’m sure of it.
2 posted on
02/19/2020 3:43:07 AM PST by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point finger at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to makne ends meet)
To: SunkenCiv
7 posted on
02/19/2020 4:06:44 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Everyone knows Hillary was corrupt, lied, destroyed documents, and influenced witnesses. Rat crime.)
To: Adder
An underground shrine to Romulus is plausible, but a sarcophagus is contrary to the tradition that Romulus disappeared in a whirlwind. If there is a sarcophagus, then the alternative account gains credence — that a jealous Senate tore Romulus limb from limb.
To: Adder
10 posted on
02/19/2020 4:17:25 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Adder
11 posted on
02/19/2020 4:35:23 AM PST by
golux
To: Adder
What evidence is there that the sarcophagus they found belongs to THE Romulus, legendary founder of Rome? I mean, is he the only one who ever bore that name? Odds are, probably not.
12 posted on
02/19/2020 5:21:01 AM PST by
fidelis
(Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
To: Adder
Huh.
They found asparagus in Rome.
Probably some broccoli in Venice.
14 posted on
02/19/2020 5:30:11 AM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Adder
Not sure I believe this.
Wouldn’t something mentioning Romulus also have mentioned Remus? (Or at least the briar patch or the tar baby)
17 posted on
02/19/2020 6:20:27 AM PST by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
