Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik

I’m pretty done with you since you are one of those annoying skeptics who never provide any numbers or references, just vagaries. You do this in the face of a post FULL of hard, sourced numbers and claim you know better.

Sorry, but I don’t debate with people like that. I usually just say, “Thanks, liberal, but I’m out.”

Here’s the thing - as I pointed out in my post, and others point out - China is fudging the numbers.

What we have to ask is: are they more likely to fudge the numbers UP or DOWN? What has history taught us? DO they want to look “totally in control” or “teetering on the edge of chaos?”


27 posted on 02/14/2020 10:43:17 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: bolobaby

“I’m pretty done with you since you are one of those annoying skeptics who never provide any numbers or references, just vagaries. “

Skeptic = bad guy.

Well I am told that by the climate change activists too, soooooooooooooooooooooo I dont care.

“You do this in the face of a post FULL of hard, sourced numbers and claim you know better.”

What hard sourced? LOL! Because I’ve yet to hear any numbers that aren’t immediately dismissed, questioned or have people tacking on x100 to the end.

“Sorry, but I don’t debate with people like that. I usually just say, “Thanks, liberal, but I’m out.””

“Dont question me you denier!!!!!!! Dont you know I’m a conservative!”?

Seriously?

“as I pointed out in my post, and others point out - China is fudging the numbers.”

No s*it? And your numbers are just estimations for anything that isnt in China since NO ONE has anything to go on. You arent the only one that follows this stuff.

https://old.reddit.com/r/China_Flu/

“What we have to ask is: are they more likely to fudge the numbers UP or DOWN? What has history taught us? DO they want to look “totally in control” or “teetering on the edge of chaos?””

The ignorant and the crooked fudge numbers. One does it to safe face and cover-up their screw-ups, the other does it the other way and says “I’m just trying to be safe than sorry”.


31 posted on 02/14/2020 10:54:29 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby

Since we KNOW the numbers we’ve been given from China are bogus, the only numbers we can really assess are those from outside of China. So far, both the infection rate and the death rate appear to be quite low in comparison to those China-provided numbers.


34 posted on 02/14/2020 11:02:37 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby

Since we KNOW the numbers we’ve been given from China are bogus, the only numbers we can really assess are those from outside of China. So far, both the infection rate and the death rate appear to be quite low in comparison to those China-provided numbers.


35 posted on 02/14/2020 11:02:38 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: bolobaby

Since we KNOW the numbers we’ve been given from China are bogus, the only numbers we can really assess are those from outside of China. So far, both the infection rate and the death rate appear to be quite low in comparison to those China-provided numbers. It’s going to have to really explode soon or I don’t see the outcome you are suggesting that everyone panic over.


37 posted on 02/14/2020 11:05:25 AM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson