[Rastus]

If she’d said it was a transitioning merman, FB wouldn’t have objected in the first place.

[Tallguy]

“Gjerskov appealed Facebook’s decision and late on Sunday the social media giant reversed course...”

This is a fundamental problem with all social media — the over reliance on canned algorithms to enforce a “standard”.

[Hatteras]

“The Little Mermaid is simply too naked for Facebook. I cannot advertise for my blog because TV2 chose the mermaid as the visual attraction. I hadn’t seen it coming that our national treasure would be categorized on the same level as child pornography and that sort of abomination,” Gjerskov wrote on Facebook with a screen shot of the company’s rejection, which pointed to “too much bare skin or sexual undertones”.

Could be worse. She could have been from Brussels...

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[aquila48]

This, though, is perfectly fine...

https://www-fosters-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.fosters.com/news/20190822/go-topless-day-2019-coming-to-hampton-beach?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&template=ampart&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15790461107308&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fosters.com%2Fnews%2F20190822%2Fgo-topless-day-2019-coming-to-hampton-beach

[CIB-173RDABN]

I once had a photo blocked on facebook. It was a photo of a water tower. They have dirty minds over there at Facebook.

(I hit the link for a human to check out the photo and it was unblocked in a couple of hours.)

[upchuck]

This is the Facebook Is Evil ping list.

If you'd like to be on or off this list, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.

[combat_boots]

They burqified her?