Posted on 12/01/2019 6:17:33 PM PST by Morgana
Abortion is necessary for a thriving world, according to two influential women who recently spoke to Harpers Bazaar about feminism.
Last month, the magazine published an interview between actress Jameela Jamil and feminist icon Gloria Steinem. Their conversation went largely unnoticed by media outlets, but it shouldnt have mainly because of the absurd claims the two made. Among them, they insisted that abortion is necessary for democracy. And, they warned, some people control reproduction as a tool for sexism or racism, like white evangelical Trump supporters.
From the beginning of their interview, Jamil and Steinem focused on abortion.
I, similarly to you, feel very passionately about a woman's right to choose, Jamil told Steinem. Earlier this year, Jamil publicized her own abortion as the best decision she had ever made.
Jamil stressed that abortion should be available, and not just for emergencies.
People have abortions, sometimes a woman just wants her liberty, and we have to normalize that it's okay just to make that choice for yourself, because your life is as important as a newborn life that doesn't even exist yet.
But for a woman, abortion is never just a choice for yourself because while a newborn life may not exist yet, an unborn life does.
For her part, Jamil made no acknowledgment of the pro-life position. Steinem agreed with her about the importance of abortion and added that her eyes were opened to the need for a womens movement when she attended a speak-out about abortion event.
It took me a while to understand that the first step in every authoritarian regime is controlling reproduction, and that means controlling us, Steinem said. Unless wemen and womenhave power over our own bodies and voices, there is no such thing as democracy.
The irony that abortion violates the bodies and voices of millions of baby boys and girls was lost on her. The irony that abortion itself can be used to control reproduction was also left untouched.
Steinem went so far as to make a Hitler comparison.
[E]very authoritarian regime that I have ever read about, including Hitler's rise to power, every regime starts with controlling reproduction and that means controlling women's bodies, she stressed.
Jamil inserted her own reasoning: It's because it's the one thing that men cannot do that we can do. Steinem clarified, Yes, we have wombs.
At another point, Steinem repeated that there is no democracy if women don't control their own physical selves. And, according to her, there also wouldnt be a healthy Earth.
[P]art of the reason for the environmental crisis is forcing women to have children they wouldn't otherwise choose to have, she insisted, admitting that abortion doesnt just affect the woman.
While speaking about women of color and feminism, the two again brought the discussion back to reproduction in countries like India.
A major reason that patriarchal systems control reproduction is to perpetuate visible racial difference in racist society or caste, according to Steinem. Thus, racism is factored in that.
She didnt mention that abortion itself is often used to also control women and end baby girls lives simply because they are female.
Instead, Steinem continued, if you cannot control reproduction, then people fall in love and marry each other, and the visible lines of difference among and between races begins to disappear so that sexism and racism are intertwined and they cannot be uprooted separately.
But abortion, a central point for Steinems feminism, can be used to do exactly that to allow for a sexist society to petuate by destroying baby girls or even a racist culture to continue by ending the lives of the unwanted.
Jamil pointed out that Steinem recently argued that there's a fear that not enough white women are being born and that there's a need to control abortion to make sure that more and more white women are born.
Steinem blamed that fear on white nationalists and religious Americans.
For instance, the white evangelicals are supporting Trump solely on the issue of abortion, she said. It has to do with their racism.
Jamils reasoning conflicted with Steinems. Instead of ensuring more white people are born, they needed more African American people.
Jamil added that there's an added insidious layer here, where they are also choosing areas where you have a lot of African-Americans, and where they are controlling abortion and being able to take that away from women who perhaps financially don't have the same kind of privilege as others.
A lack of abortion hurt them, she said, or It's this extra way of creating a structure of poverty amongst an already marginalized community.
Steinem agreed, and also connected it to the economy.
When there is a need for cheap labor, the ways for women of color to control their own reproductive lives are restricted, she said.
Had either Steinem or Jamil spared a moment to consult with one of the many national pro-life organizations, they would have heard a simpler answer motivating the opposition to abortion. It has nothing to do with their theories, they would hear. But it has everything to do with recognizing the intrinsic dignity of every human person a person whose life begins at conception.
Excellent. Democracy sucks a$$. Lets get back to the true constitutional republic.
Gloria should do everyone a favor and self abort right now..she can take one for the cause
because your life is as important as a newborn life that doesn’t even exist yet....
WOW that hurt my head :)
Is this person six and developmentally disabled?
Democracy is just another form of populism.
Look at the positions democrats have held the last couple hundred years, the things they have supported.
So you cant vote when pregnant?
You cant vote with a baby in your arms?
You cant write your congressman or take part in protests or even hold office when youre pregnant or have a child?
BS
If FDR can be President WHILE paralyzed - pregnant women can too.
Or is Gloria Steinem suggesting that all women are weaker than an old white paralyzed man?
This starkly illustrates how the left misuses the word democracy.
The left says “democracy” as their name for neo-Bolshevism.
Democracy is two wolves voting on abortion.
Wait, that won’t work. Wolves don’t kill their offspring.
See, Hitler was just trying to make Germany a better place. That noble sentiment obviously justified killing 6 million Jews, just like us killing 60 million babies is justified by the desire of these women to do whatever they want.
Mass Murderers, plain and simple.
Most abortions are because of adultery and fornication.
They say “democracy” but they are talking about neo-Bolshevism
Were not a democracy and I believe we should stop
Abortion on demand
Knock down Roe and declare it a State issue and require that the issue be settled in each State with a vote by the public rather than their "representatives". Then you'd have democracy rather than the system of bought and paid for State and Federal Legislatures we now have.
They pretend abortion sets them free, when in fact it imprisons them in their selfishness.
I would like to see a headline that reads rather, “No one is safe as long as abortionists and their customers are not prosecuted by the state for 1st degree murder”
No idea what one has to do with the other, Gloria, and incidentally, they have abortion in Communist China too.
It’s because it’s the one thing that men cannot do that we can do. Steinem clarified
= = =
She needs to get Woke. Trans women can do all that women can.
Of course, Harper’s asked them tough questions about eugenics, racism, and abortion. Oops, never mind...
Wow.
Gloria Steinem... proof that only the good die young. And I wonder if she sold her soul to the devil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.