Only those who are involved in Principal Review have seen the report, and they only get to see the section that pertains to them, only in a SCIF, and only after signing a non-disclosure agreement.
Leakers would be instantly identifiable and subject to criminal penalties.
Moreover, since when does anyone with a brain believe CNN?
“Leakers would be instantly identifiable and subject to criminal penalties.”
Bingo you are 100% right on target!! Your excellent post ends the debate!! >:-)
Yeah, I think you nailed it. Last night on CNN, Cuomo was soft-soaping it, saying it was not that big a deal, and that there would be no blockbuster referrals in the DOJ IG report, but gave no indication that he had a sense of what is in the entire report.
Tump, on the other hand, seems to have high expectations that it will be “historic” based on what he has “heard.” Gotta wonder from whom he heard it.
It won’t be long until we find out, it appears.
Partly correct. See reply 52. Any "Top Secret" related components are viewed in the SCIF and have the NDA attached.
The reviewers could see the name of someone else in the section that pertains to them and THAT is how this got out. Directing attention away from them onto this low level flunky.
Low level flunky reported that big dog boss told him to...
Get my drift? Big dog boss gets to read it and can disclose to the MSM the non Top Secret portion without violating the NDA.