Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fighting Back: GOP, Pay Attention...
Vanity ^ | 10/24/2019 | pgyanke

Posted on 10/24/2019 8:53:23 PM PDT by pgyanke

I appreciate the GOP for at least putting on a show yesterday at Adam Schiff's private party. However, there is a better way to tackle this... hold hearings of your own.

Adam Schiff may be the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee... but doesn't the GOP have the Senate and a Judiciary Committee of theirr own? If the GOP truly wants to win (which is often in doubt) they should convene the Senate Judiciary Committee and call each witness to testify after Adam Schiff is done with them. Let their questioning and testimony be done in public.

Don't like secret hearings? Hold public ones. Simple.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: graham; hearings; judiciary
Instant cross-examination.

Just my two cents.

1 posted on 10/24/2019 8:53:23 PM PDT by pgyanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Might also make them pretty useless in a trial by the Senate?

Sounds like a great idea to moi.


2 posted on 10/24/2019 8:56:13 PM PDT by Adder (Mr. Franklin: We are trying to get the Republic back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

One train of thought is that if Republicans do their own investigations, if they hold their own hearings, it will give credibility and respectability to these bogus whistle blower charges. Even if they prove conclusively that none of these baseless lies are true, It may not work out so well to our advantage.

Perhaps the best plan of action is to let these silly liberal idiots conduct their kabuki theater and then if and when it gets to the Senate, Hold an immediate vote to deny removing the President.


3 posted on 10/24/2019 9:09:20 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke; Adder; Responsibility2nd

Take an evening watching “High Noon.”

No need to add anything. That’s EXACTLY what’s going on here.

Townspeople (the GOP leadership) letting the Sheriff put himself on the line for them.

Like the townspeople in “High Noon,” they should be ashamed.


4 posted on 10/24/2019 9:22:58 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Subpoena Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. If they won’t show up...gotcha! If they do, then neither, as witnesses, can do any questioning. Plus you expose Schiff’s lying and his conspiracy to overthrow the President by the subterfuge of an impeachment.

C’mon, Lindsay, subpoena Schiff!


5 posted on 10/24/2019 9:36:07 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
There is 1 House & 1 Senate Judiciary Committee. Both have Republican & Democrats on them.

The House Judiciary Committee is controlled by the Democrats (hold majority), and the Senate Judiciary Committee is controlled by the Republicans (hold majority). Hopefully that answers your question.

6 posted on 10/24/2019 9:38:56 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

The senate chairman man

The Senate Intelligence committee chairman promised to investigate a lot of the wrong doings but has of yet refused to even open up hearings on anything. I believe he is afraid of any findings that may come out of Senate hearings might implicate him. He is just another deep state swamp dweller.


7 posted on 10/25/2019 8:56:15 PM PDT by WesternPacific (The herded sheep have finally arrived at the slaughter house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
The issue is that the House has the power of impeachment, not the Senate. How would the Senate justify overseeing the House's process of impeachment when Article I Section 6 prevents either chamber from questioning the other?

The problem is historical Republican cowardice, weakness, and fecklessness.

While Nancy Pelosi is pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable with "impeachment inquiries" in the House, we have Mitch McConnell declaring that: 1) he's powerless to influence the Senate, 2) he will take impeachment up immediately and for as long as it takes, and 3) he will work with Democrats to establish the process of the Senate trial.

To answer my opening question, the Senate would show how the House's articles of impeachment are flawed, biased, and lack due process. However, McConnell is not up to that task: 1) he's unwilling to match Pelosi's tradition-busting with his own in response, 2) he's abdicated his power to control the agenda, and 3) he's going to give the Democrats power that they didn't give their own House counter-parts, probably anticipated by Democrats from the very start.

Everything going on now is intended to manipulate McConnell into behaving in the most favorable way towards what Democrats want.

-PJ

8 posted on 10/25/2019 9:13:25 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson