Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ridiculous Shift – Adam Schiff No Longer Requires CIA Gossip for Impeachment Testimony…
theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | october 13, 2019 | sundance

Posted on 10/13/2019 6:22:23 PM PDT by ransomnote

Well, this was entirely predictable.  First the impeachment strategy needed the anonymous CIA gossiper to testify.  Then it leaked about how HPSCI Chairman Adam Shiff and his Lawfare staff actually created the “gossiper’s” silly third-hand complaint to an inspector general; who then changed ‘gossip’ rules to allow second and third-hand hearsay.

It was all becoming more brutally sketchy, and the impeachment jenga blocks were tenuous at best.  As a result, republicans were going to inquire about how the CIA gossiper constructed his complaint; and then the complaint attorney’s started saying the gossiper would not appear in person, but rather write more complaint letters instead of testifying.

The shift from sketchy testimony to “Dear Sir” letters was ridiculous in the extreme. So what happens next?  Well, this is predictable…. Chairman Adam Schiff now says there will likely be no gossiper testimony because now he doesn’t need it.  [@4:52 video]

[Transcript]  REP. SCHIFF: You know and I think initially, before the president started threatening the whistleblower, threatening others calling them traitors and spies and suggesting that you know we used to give the death penalty to traitors and spies and maybe we should think about that again. Yes we were interested in having the whistleblower come forward. Our primary–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Not anymore?

 

REP. SCHIFF: Well our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected. Indeed, now there’s more than one whistleblower, that they are protected. And given that we already have the call record, we don’t need the whistleblower who wasn’t on the call to tell us what took place during the call. We have the best evidence of that. We do want to make sure that we identify other evidence that is pertinent to the withholding of the military support, the effort to cover this up by hiding this in a classified computer system. We want to make sure that we uncover the full details about the conditionality of either the military aid or that meeting with Ukraine’s president. It may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistleblower’s identity to do that. And we’re going to make sure we protect that whistleblower.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You know who was on that July 25th call? You know all the participants?

REP. SCHIFF: I can’t say that I do. But we now know what took place on that call. We are bringing in witnesses this coming week from the National Security Council, other State Department officials, to find out what they can tell us about the conditionality of this vital military assistance to an ally. The conditionality of this vital meeting between the two presidents and the president’s effort to dig up dirt on his opponent.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Quickly, do you regret saying that we, the committee, weren’t in touch with the whistleblower?

REP. SCHIFF: I should have been much more clear and I said so the minute it was brought to my attention that I was referring to the fact that when the whistleblower filed the complaint, we had not heard from the whistleblower. We wanted to bring the whistleblower in at that time. But I should’ve been much more clear about that. (read more)

 


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: adamschiff; couppeachment; fakeimpeachment; gossiop; impeachment; impeachmentfarce; schiff; schiffyism; sundance; trumpimpeachment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: ransomnote

Schiff is the whistleblower. The whole narrative is pure fantasy. They never expected Trump to release the transcript of the call.
The last I heard, Schiff now claims there need be no quid pro quo in order to impeach. The Dems. have painted themselves into a corner.


21 posted on 10/14/2019 7:08:38 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

This whistle blower performed a complete blow job on Shifty.


22 posted on 10/15/2019 9:48:55 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

in a court of law a prosecutor cannot put a witness on who they know will perjure themselves...wb said he did not contact congress


23 posted on 10/15/2019 9:52:21 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no justice no peace and leakers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Heck, why even bother with evidence at all? This affair reached the status of embarrassing charade long ago, and will go down in history as precisely that. The only comfort is that apparently it’s all the Dems have to do, actually governing the country obviously being quite beyond their capacity.


24 posted on 10/15/2019 10:00:49 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson