Posted on 10/07/2019 9:42:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin
Warm weather?.................
Hapgood's initial idea was that the ice build up around the pole(s) would be sufficiently imbalanced (as e.g. it is now in Antarctica) that the centrifugal forces would cause the shifts to occur where a new polar ice build up would begin that would eventually cause another shift. Apparently this idea has been discredited. Considering that Einstein accepted this mechanism a possibility, I'm not sure how discredited it could be. But no matter. We don't really need to know the mechanism to believe that it occurs. It's amazing to me how many things that have absurd explanations in Geology texts (e.g. mountain formation) can be simply explained by the crust shifting over the oblate core.
ML/NJ
Yes
Golly! Can those “spike” GPS locations be plotted as a hockey stick?
Then MicroNova of sun, 1500 years later to melt.
OR, Impact, several years of reduced sunlight followed by residual airborne gases or particulate matter holding in the warmth after the initial cooling to reverse the process.
Must have been tough to be a hunter/gatherer back then!
A little bit of spit or hair grease can affect the rotation of a baseball. So I guess billions of tons of ice added to or subtracted from could affect Earth’s rotation as well.
The Bray (Hallstatt) is the strongest of all the solar cycles with a cycle of 2400 ±200 years. The next cycle is due around 2180 AD. The timing of this cycle has fallen on ever major glaciation in history including the Younger Dryas.
These global alarmist has done everything they can to distract from real science.
You know... There is another physical connection I very rarely see discussed that could also influence this. Center of mass Barycenter of the Earth/Moon lock, and the Barycenter lock of all planets and the sun in the solar system that do affect each other especially during particular alignment events. We are dancing a jig as it is, and this could also have great crustal influence.
Carolina Bays and Impacts article:
“...the Younger Days Impact Hypothesis is a highly controversial idea, given the lack of evidence.”
take away
1. Hypothesis
2. highly controversial idea
3. lack of evidence
Okay, “What If” is a fun game, but let’s not take it too seriesly.
Orpheus, the imaginary planet/asteroid. It doesn’t exist. It never existed. The moon was not formed because of a collision. It’s all SPECULATION and “What If”.
http://www.alphatucana.co.uk/orpheus-collision-snowball-earth/
It would then coincide with the procession of the equinoxes every 24k then? The graph of glacial/interglacial periods I shared above in #16 taken from ice cores shows a regular shift in the cycle on an average of every 24,000 years. I am firm believer that we set our sites to short trying to find just one cause, when it could be a combination of several different influences happening at the same time.
Wildebeest are extinct?
That's gnus to me.
When we have a pole shift the magnetic field weakens making us very vulnerable to a large solar flare.
Ick. I saw her on that cable tv show where she was having sex with some white dude, shrunk him up and sucked him up into her vajayjay.
Flood, Fire, and Famine
in the History of Civilization
by Richard Firestone,
Allen West, and
Simon Warwick-Smith
It's important to point out that the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis is a highly controversial idea, given the lack of evidence.
[buzzer noise] It's important to point out that the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis is the only idea for which there is any evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
