Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement from the Press Secretary (court stops gov from enforcing expedited illegal alien removal)
whitehouse.gov ^ | September 28, 2019 | Whitehouse

Posted on 09/29/2019 1:41:31 PM PDT by ransomnote

Once again, a single district judge has suspended application of Federal law nationwide—removing whole classes of illegal aliens from legal accountability. In 1996, Congress passed a law explicitly and unambiguously authorizing expedited removal of illegal aliens within two years of their arrival in this country—a law currently codified in 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(iii). While previous administrations severely curtailed application of this law, the Trump Administration has used this critical tool to the full extent that Congress authorized to respond to the unprecedented crisis in our immigration system and at our southern border. That tool is vital to addressing the many aliens in the United States who have no right to remain here. A single judge is now prohibiting the Government from enforcing the law as written.

For two and a half years, the Trump Administration has been trying to restore enforcement of the immigration laws passed by Congress. And for two and a half years, misguided lower court decisions have been preventing those laws from ever being enforced—at immense cost to the whole country.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: illegalalien; immigration

1 posted on 09/29/2019 1:41:31 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Come on SCOTUS shut this crap down or you might become irrelevant.


2 posted on 09/29/2019 1:43:19 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Yes, SCOTUS needs to hold an emergency hearing.

I wonder if an executive emergency order can get around this ‘enjoining’ of the President.


3 posted on 09/29/2019 1:46:17 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
HOW THE HELL CAN A DISTRICT JUDGE STOP THE PRESIDENT FROM ENFORCING THE LAW????
4 posted on 09/29/2019 1:59:31 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
A single judge is now prohibiting the Government from enforcing the law as written.

Does this "single judge" have any ability to enforce his decision?

ML/NJ

5 posted on 09/29/2019 1:59:33 PM PDT by ml/nj (eeter hope ther are no statue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Article 2 - The Executive Branch
Section 3 - State of the Union, Convening Congress

...he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed...

In 1996, Congress passed a law explicitly and unambiguously authorizing expedited removal of illegal aliens within two years of their arrival in this country—a law currently codified in 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(iii).

Come on President Trump. Let's hear "U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has made his decision; now let him enforce it.”

6 posted on 09/29/2019 2:02:24 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

How many divisions does the judge have?


7 posted on 09/29/2019 2:11:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Because the judge is a liberal and they invent reasons to overturn laws or create new ones.


8 posted on 09/29/2019 2:13:25 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

These days, that would result in instant impeachment - and it would be sustained by the squishes in the Senate.


9 posted on 09/29/2019 2:46:56 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I understand Trump wanting to follow the law, but he should announce he will follow that judge’s order in the district he is responsible, but will not comply in other districts until ordered by the appropriate judge.


10 posted on 09/29/2019 2:56:09 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

ketanji says it all. Yet another affirmative-action hire. I bet his degree is from howard u or equivalent. The supreme court should send someone to throw this guy out of his office and seize his “black robes”. Unconstitutional overreach much????


11 posted on 09/29/2019 3:24:11 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

No single judge should ever have that much power. Only a panel of vetted non-partisan or equal numbers of partisan judges with a 2/3 majority should and it should come with a legal explanation before going to SCOTUS for further review.


12 posted on 09/29/2019 3:53:26 PM PDT by Boomer (Our melting pot has turned into a pressure cooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“...Once again, a single district judge has suspended application of Federal law nationwide—removing whole classes of illegal aliens from legal accountability....”
***********************************************************

And cases such as this demonstrate the importance of EACH and every DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, There are 673 authorized federal District Judgeships. This past week the Senate voted on and confirmed ZERO District Court nominees. The week preceding that the Senate voted on and confirmed ZERO District Court nominees. Earlier this month the Senate returned from a six week summer recess. And now they’re starting yet another recess for two weeks.

When Trump assumed office there were 86 vacant District Court judgeships. There are now 97 vacant District Court judgeships. What a difference we could see if these 97 vacancies were filled with Trump appointees. The more Trump District Judges we have, the lower the chances of important cases such as this current one being randomly assigned to Agendanista Obama hack appointees.

There are 71 of Trump’s Judicial nominees pending confirmation in the Senate (of which 51 are pending in Lindsey Graham’s Judiciary Committee). This is INEXCUSABLE! Graham needs to no longer allow the DemocRATS to use the Blue Slip process to stop consideration of Trump’s nominees. And McConnell needs to schedule confirmation votes on nominees quickly after they’re out of the Judiciary Committee.


13 posted on 09/29/2019 8:52:42 PM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Sick of Judicial activist judges imposing their “limited” view on the rest of us.


14 posted on 10/01/2019 10:49:04 AM PDT by Metrobank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
And WHO signed that bill into law in 1996, hmmmm?

-PJ

15 posted on 10/01/2019 10:52:14 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson