Posted on 09/24/2019 11:27:30 PM PDT by Impy
Yes, it’s done for my convenience when recording the picks.
It was close.
*sigh*, just when I had hope.....oh the fate of a Lions fan.
Yeah. I’m super impressed with Kansas City this year.
What a Sunday. Almost all of my picks lost!
At least I don’t gamble for a living, or I’d be starving!
thanks for the tally...
i am the epitome of adequacy...
striving for average... yes.
That reminds me a class slogan we had in a group I belonged to at the Battalion S1 Course.
“We may be slow, but we do poor work”
That pass to Kelsey with the hook-and-ladder lateral to McCoy was one for the books. It looked like it was planned but you know it was spur of the moment.
At least I dont gamble for a living, or Id be starving!
I was sitting there thinking the same thing.... what a week...
Seattle to win on Thursday
Dark Angel and the Monqey share the crown. LTOWN and myself notch Minority Reports.
Feel free to post Thurs (or all) picks here in the old thread if you want. New thread maybe tonight.
: 9-6
: 9-6
: 8-7
: 8-7
: 8-7
: 8-7
: 8-7
: 8-7
: 7-8
: 7-8
: 7-8
: 7-8
: 7-8
: 6-9
: 6-9
: 6-9
: 5-10
: 4-11
: 0-1
: 0-0
: 1-0
Wow ... tough week.
My first sub-500 week this season. Ugh.
Oh well - there’s always Astros baseball to look forward to!
No way man, I ain’t buying this. The RUSSIANS hacked the scores. I shoulda had the crown all to my self. ME ME ME!
|
wk1 |
wk2 |
wk3 |
wk4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
screen name |
15 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
w |
gp |
pct |
prev wk |
curr wk |
net chg |
big'ol_freeper |
13 |
11 |
10 |
8 |
42 |
62 |
0.677 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
al_c |
11 |
11 |
12 |
7 |
41 |
62 |
0.661 |
1 |
2 |
-1 |
Impy |
10 |
12 |
10 |
8 |
40 |
62 |
0.645 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
Enterprise |
11 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
39 |
62 |
0.629 |
6 |
4 |
+2 |
mmichaels1970 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
39 |
62 |
0.629 |
6 |
4 |
+2 |
toast |
12 |
10 |
10 |
6 |
38 |
62 |
0.613 |
3 |
6 |
-3 |
campaignPete R-CT |
12 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
38 |
62 |
0.613 |
3 |
6 |
-3 |
zzeeman |
10 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
37 |
62 |
0.597 |
10 |
8 |
+2 |
ro_dreaming |
11 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
36 |
62 |
0.581 |
10 |
9 |
+1 |
DoodleDawg |
9 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
35 |
62 |
0.565 |
13 |
10 |
+3 |
darkangel82 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
9 |
35 |
62 |
0.565 |
15 |
10 |
+5 |
Alas Babylon! |
8 |
10 |
11 |
4 |
33 |
62 |
0.532 |
10 |
12 |
-2 |
Bender2 |
11 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
33 |
62 |
0.532 |
13 |
12 |
+1 |
teeman8r |
11 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
33 |
62 |
0.532 |
15 |
12 |
+3 |
moehoward |
10 |
12 |
9 |
0 |
31 |
62 |
0.500 |
6 |
15 |
-9 |
Phlap |
12 |
10 |
8 |
0 |
30 |
62 |
0.484 |
9 |
16 |
-7 |
RedMonqey |
0 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
28 |
62 |
0.452 |
18 |
17 |
+1 |
Rummyfan |
1 |
11 |
8 |
7 |
27 |
62 |
0.435 |
17 |
18 |
-1 |
L,TOWM |
10 |
0 |
8 |
5 |
23 |
62 |
0.371 |
19 |
19 |
0 |
Jack Black |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
62 |
0.113 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
What a week... 7 - 8... Good thing I’m not putting money on these picks.
QB - I think that Wilson is the better QB than Goff.
RB - Carson and Gurley are both very good. I think that generally, Carson must be relied on more in the offense than Gurley. And here's why.
WR - Seattle has Lockett and Metcalf. Rams have the trio of Crooks, Woods, and Kupp. I give the edge to the WRs of Rams. Because the Rams have three good receivers, Seattle must compensate with either RB Carson or TE Dissley.
TE - Dissly must be relied upon because of the firepower of the Rams WR's. It paid off against Arizona as he was targeted 8 times with 7 receptions, 57 yards and a touchdown. Higbee cannot be overlooked with the Rams. (Note: Analysts have pointed out that Arizona is having a tough time covering the TE of their opposing teams.
Summation:
QB - Wilson
RB - Carson
WR - Rams
TE - Dissly
Still, I'm picking Rams.
Can the Rams put up another 40 points? Maybe.
Can Seattle put up 55 points? I don't think so.
What's going to happen Thursday? Well since football genius Enterprise picks Rams, Seahawks will probably win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.