ADL has studied the pervasiveness of anti-Semitic content on social media,
and we know that a relatively small number of extremists are able to amplify
their message quickly and broadly through social media. ADL regularly
reports on such phenomena, and we wíll report on extremist praise for
Iceland. We urge you to consider the significant media attention, in the U.S,
and intemationally, paid to ADL reports on extremism. In the past six
months alone, our research and experts have been featured on CNN and other
cable TV channels, NBC and other broadcast TV, on 60 Minuíes, the most
watched TV news magazine in America, and in leading newspapers,
including The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Given that 28% of Iceland’s tourists came from North America in 2016,
Iceland’s standing in the U.S. should be of great concern from an economic
perspective, We are confident that the vast majority of American tourists will
avoid a country whose reputation is associated with Nazism, even if that
association is not justified.
Individually, any of these three arguments should convince you to oppose a
ban on male circumcision, Collectively, they should compel you to make the
right decision and oppose the proposed ban.
That is the bullying...
I mean it is advocacy... Which sort of amounts to. Nice country there. We can send all American media after you...
It never states that at all. It states that making it a country where Jews can not possibly reside in due to a ban that prohibits a Jewish commandment means that neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other extremists will celebrate their actions eliminate Jewish citizens. I personally disagree with the ADL on a host of issues, but this one is not one of them. Why is Iceland banning circumcision in the first place? Is it to free the country of Jewish citizens or some other reason? If it is another reason tells us what that reason is. As far as I can tell it is to make Iceland uninhabitable for Jewish people, because I certainly cannot see a reason for banning circumcision.