UCSF School of Pharmacy
Posted on 09/08/2019 5:54:09 AM PDT by rickmichaels
Edited on 09/08/2019 6:04:34 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I knew a woman who was married to a professional man. He worked hard, long hours, was always inventive, creative. He was a dedicated father; she demanded it, for sure, but even beyond that, he was all in and was an extremely active dad. She didn’t like to cook, didn’t think it was her job, so he learned how. She didn’t like to tidy up, and he was no Mr. Clean, but he gave it a go. She wanted him to be compliant, yet resilient, and he tried to be all of the things she wanted. He even pretty well achieved it. He’d come so far that he sent us all a poem about how to appease the women in his house, who wanted him to leave the toilet seat down, he learned to pee sitting down. What a mensch! Only, in the end, she tired of his acquiescence and left him for a belligerent roofer 10 years her junior.
The New York Post took aim yesterday at a study called “Mismatches in the Marriage Market” in the Journal of Marriage and Family, that explains that women often don’t marry because there is a dearth of marriageable men. Apparently, the definition of marriageable is “makes 58% more money than any of the dudes available right now.” The “patriarchy” used to keep men and women in their places, and now that women are achieving at higher rates than men, it’s still the “patriarchy” that is keeping everyone from being happy.
In the old system, women went to college to find husbands or got jobs as receptionists at law offices to marry an esquire before quitting the job market to take on the dual roles of housewife and mother. This imbalance in earnings and status was deemed to be just no good for the female half of the species, who ended up poorly educated, often jilted in middle-age, and back in the workforce without even a pretty face to get by.
Plus, men were not great. They lacked emotion, they were too focused on careers, ambition, status, fulfilling the role of provider. The patriarchy had done these dudes a bad turn, had made them so concerned with achieving the masculine ideal that they didn’t measure up to what their women wanted or needed. And women were stuck with the status quo.
A big push was made for women to go get more from life, husbands, love, family, all that stuff paled in comparison to what was achievable if women buckled down, hit the books, and entered the capitalist machine as worker bees eager for their own honey. Great, why not? Go get it, girl.
And they did get it. Under equity feminism, more women have college degrees than ever before, more women are successful in their fields, yet more women are unable to find suitable matches because men, it turns out, just can’t measure up to women’s expectations. Again.
If you’re one of the single ladies out there, this will not be a surprise. I cannot count how many intelligent, independent, attractive, [bleep] women I know who can’t find a guy they want to spend more than one night with, and even that is a stretch.
For a while, women were complaining that guys were afraid of commitment, that women couldn’t find a man who wanted a real relationship, babies, the works. But somewhere along the line, when the college degrees were awarded in greater quantity to the fairer sex, ladies began to have a different complaint. I started to hear friends carp about guys who wanted more than a hook-up, guys who wanted their time and attention when not rolling in hay as well. Why, just last night, a good friend, independent, hot, confident, all of that, told me she had to cut a guy loose because he was texting her asking how her day went instead of simply reaching out to find a suitable time for sex.
Is it any wonder that women out there who want to get hitched can’t find anyone suitable to hitch their wagon to? Guys have been overtaken by female accomplishments (kudos, ladies), and still have no idea what women want. A hookup? A commitment? A high earner? A hard worker? A partner? A housewife?
Women didn’t like how men were, so they demanded they change. Men changed, and now that they have, women don’t like what they’ve changed into. Women want soft, emotional, high achieving, career focused tough guys who don’t get angry, remember anniversaries, bring flowers, and can splurge on expensive meals and trips, without working all weekend, and still make it to little Johnny’s ballet recitals.
Contemporary woke feminism doesn’t care about equality. It demands that men strip themselves of their toxic masculinity, their desire to compete and achieve, to become more stereotypically femme, so that women don’t have to do all the emotional heavy lifting. Okay. But on the other hand, women want men to be high-achieving, breadwinning earners, who are professionally successful, and, if Tinder is any indication, taller than them as well.
The only problem is that these toxic characteristics are essential for success in the marketplace. When men let them go, all those things that these traits facilitated fall by the wayside as well. Men are emasculated for not achieving just as they are demeaned for those attributes that enable achievement. Wtf, yo?
Why not just let men be men with all of their bumbling, masculine, competitive energy? The truth is that most women want the opposite of a woke Gillette ad. They want high-achieving, strong men to be partners with. Even if they don’t know that they want that, or don’t want to admit to it, reality reveals they sure as hell do. Otherwise, no intelligent woman who got her man to do everything she claimed she wanted, including coming up with an ingenious way to make sure the toilet seat was permanently in her preferred position, would leave him for someone who promised nothing but stereotypical masculinity.
Face it, feminist wants a girlfriend with a penis, not a husband (man)...
That's the problem right there. Why do men need permission to live the lives they want to live? Maybe the problem is that men are trying to be everything everyone else expects them to be rather than who they are.
I'm not just saying that to the feminists. Other men are just as guilty. Men think there's something wrong with other men who don't want to go screwing a different woman every weekend, even though many if not most of the conquests they brag about are lies anyway. But either way, so what if your male friend doesn't believe in shooting his sperm all over the landscape? What is that to you?
“...Face it, feminist wants a girlfriend with a penis, not a husband (man)...”
Yep. Some guys will not date and/or marry American women for that very reason.
There are millions of foreign women that...well, they’re just women. Yeah, there’s aways a few bad apples in every barrel, but, like liberalism (communism), feminism has destroyed most American women as a traditional mate. Besides, most feminists look to be ugly, fat and lesbians.
1 Timothy 5:8
But if any provide not for his own,
and specially for those of his own house,
he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel
...nothing ever changes, men must provide for the women and children
...Men have forgotten to love their wives, as Christ Loves the church
Ephesians 5:22
Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
Women have forgotten to submit to their husbands in all things
the bed grows cold, women are barren, and Love dies
Meanwhile, us real women want a real man.
I don’t want some effeminate, skinny jeans wearing (gag) soyboy.
And she wanted him to be "active" with the children.
So what WAS her job?
They have received what they sought. Now they must live with the consequences of that.
The problem is that we have gotten away from extended families. This b.s. is the outgrowth of the 1950’s model of dad, mom, 2.3 children with no in laws. This completely effed up American families because way too much pressure got dumped on the man and woman in a marriage producing children while able hands to make the work lighter, and other assets to insulate the young families from economic shocks were expected to be squandered and handed off to mortgage companies in reverse mortgages. There is no excuse for us to not go back to the pre-1950 model, especially with the options now available for a more flexible workplace. This can help solve the housing and infrastructure problems as well as reduce the need for safety net programs. Men can be men, have older men to talk to, and have a built in cheering section that is not perpetually stressed out. Win-win.
They are the three places on earth which are both fairly civilized and not poisoned by militant feminism.
For marxists, the traditional single family ceases to be the economic unit of society. Private housekeeping is transformed into a social industry. The care and education of children becomes a public affair; society looks after all all children alike, whether they are illegitimate or not. Women with this worldview don't need to get married.
And so must we.
The average Spanish woman wants one child, if that. The average woman from Niger getting on a raft to cross to Europe wants NINE,
“Face it, feminist wants a girlfriend with a penis, not a husband (man)...”
Thirty years ago I ran a small business and employed, for a time, a hellfire and brimstone preacher who once explained to me what a woman actually wants. He said that a woman wants a man to TELL HER what she wants!!! It may sound strange but the man had eight children who treated him with great respect and a wife who did the same, even calling him “Mr. Wiggins”, rather than by his first name. Most who knew him considered him a crackpot but in his house he was King and his wife and children seemed content to have it that way. I know because he was my customer before being my employee and I was in his home on several occasions before hiring him.
To constantly remind him of his faults and shortcomings.
That’s because it seems like women can’t decide what they want on any given day anymore, the under 40 and even 50 ones.
I’m 51 so I was lucky in that things were pretty traditional through all my dating years and settling down.
At the end of the day there’s only one alpha dog and that’s me.
I think many under 40 guys are the beta dogs.
There is also the age old problem of it being the desperate weirdos who deliver. There are tons of great men around but they tend to pay little attention to fashion and they are often focused on getting better at their jobs. They also seem to be the ones interacting with people from other generations, so theres a good clue for you.
“And so must we.”
This is the lot of men. Not only do we live with the consequences of our own actions, we have to live with the consequences of others actions.
UCSF School of Pharmacy
USC School of Dentistry
"Cool Aunt" Starter Kit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.