Love his analogy.
If woman can not merely abandon their baby, and that is morally O.K., then how is it wrong for a man to not accept responsibility for a child that a woman says is his.
This goes directly to the radical twist that feminism has taken, which is not where feminism began.
When feminism began is was not pro-abortion, and it was in part a reaction to the irresponsibilty of too many men, when it came to supporting a woman who was carrying his child. Such behavior by men was, and still is, considered morally irresponsible, and besides many child welfare laws, and child labor laws feminism was responsible for laws meant to getting the man to fess up to his responsibilities.
But then the sexual revolution came along, and instead of NOT wanting women to behave like a morally irresponsible man, it started saying that women COULD behave just like the men that feminism started out attacking, and women too could have sex promiscuously and if preganncy ocurred just have an abortion - voila, problem solved.
Chapelle just brought that whole hypocrisy home.
“I don’t identify as the child’s father”.