Not a fan at all of Pierce or Buchanan, but otherwise this is a good read.
1 posted on
08/28/2019 11:13:49 AM PDT by
NRx
To: NRx
Some Bourbons were anti-racist. It was the socialist Populists who were Racists in the South. In the 1870s and 1880s, Blacks some rights in the south.
2 posted on
08/28/2019 11:35:06 AM PDT by
cowboyusa
(America Cowboy Up)
To: NRx
Cleveland had more popular votes than Benjamin Harrison in 1888, but Harrison had more electoral votes. In 1884 Cleveland won by carrying New York state very narrowly, after a prominent supporter of James Blaine denounced the Democrats as the party of "rum, Romanism and rebellion," offending Catholics who might otherwise have voted for Blaine...or so the usual explanation goes. It could be that ballot-stuffing in New York City made the difference in the outcome.
I had a great-uncle, born in 1885, whose middle name was Cleveland. His father was a Democrat.
To: NRx
4 posted on
08/28/2019 12:17:23 PM PDT by
NRx
(A man of honor passes his father's civilization to his son without surrendering it to strangers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson