Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Not a fan at all of Pierce or Buchanan, but otherwise this is a good read.
1 posted on 08/28/2019 11:13:49 AM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NRx
Some Bourbons were anti-racist. It was the socialist Populists who were Racists in the South. In the 1870s and 1880s, Blacks some rights in the south.
2 posted on 08/28/2019 11:35:06 AM PDT by cowboyusa (America Cowboy Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
Cleveland had more popular votes than Benjamin Harrison in 1888, but Harrison had more electoral votes. In 1884 Cleveland won by carrying New York state very narrowly, after a prominent supporter of James Blaine denounced the Democrats as the party of "rum, Romanism and rebellion," offending Catholics who might otherwise have voted for Blaine...or so the usual explanation goes. It could be that ballot-stuffing in New York City made the difference in the outcome.

I had a great-uncle, born in 1885, whose middle name was Cleveland. His father was a Democrat.

3 posted on 08/28/2019 12:04:56 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Good general background on Cleveland...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland


4 posted on 08/28/2019 12:17:23 PM PDT by NRx (A man of honor passes his father's civilization to his son without surrendering it to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson