From this graph alone, it should be obvious to even the most casual observer, that the decay of -- for example -- Strontium 90 CANNOT BE explained by Hawking Emissions of any nature.
Posted on 08/22/2019 7:52:17 PM PDT by Windflier
The Radiation Dose Chart you posted contains information that often provides a distorted comparison of the kind of issues surrounding Chernobyl and Fukushima.
For example, dental xrays are external exposure of limited (seconds) duration after a patient approves the treatment.
Fukushima and Chernobyl do not limit dose, often result in ingestion/inhalation which irradiates bones and flesh continuously for years.
“eating a banana” is displayed on the chart, as if the harmless radiation from potassium in bananas has any comparison to radioactive Strontium, Cesium, Uranium or Plutonium released by Chernobyl and by Fukushima.
Involuntary ingestion and inhalation of radioactive wastes from Chernobyl/Fukushima incurring continuous exposure for years is displayed alongside voluntary exposure to medical xrays or naturally occurring background radiation - unfortunately, it’s an apples to oranges comparison.
No one could have foreseen an event like that tsunami.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually, there were studies that projected the event and recommendations to mitigate damage should the event occur, some as recent as about a year prior to the tsunami.
And they built a massive (the largest at the time) reactor elsewhere in Japan on top of a sizable fault line. :(
Wikipedia:
Potassium-40 is a rare example of an isotope that undergoes both types of beta decay. In about 89.28% of events it decays to calcium-40 (40Ca) with emission of a beta particle (β−, an electron) with a maximum energy of 1.31 MeV and an antineutrino. In about 10.72% of events it decays to argon-40 (40Ar) by electron capture (EC), with the emission of a neutrino and then a 1.460 MeV gamma ray.
You don't think that beta particles or gamma rays emitted within your body can f*ck up your cellular metabolism or mess with your DNA?
Regards,
It’s an ad.
Dr. Mark Sircus, Ac., OMD, DM (P) (acupuncturist, doctor of oriental and pastoral medicine)
Don’t worry. I have it on good authority from many freepers that radiation is good for you.
Splitting the atom should have been illegal. This is exactly why. Not to mention the latest Russian incident with its expanding network of failed regional radiation detectors. Lol.
He’s a Q-tard. That should be enough information on his factual view of the world.
“You don’t think that beta particles or gamma rays emitted within your body can f*ck up your cellular metabolism or mess with your DNA?
Regards, “
Do you actually realize how small the dose of one banana is?
You are insane. “ Readings inside the containment vessel of reactor no. 2 are as high as 530 Sieverts per hour, a dosage that would be fatal dozens and dozens of times over if a human were to be exposed to it.”
I suppose you believe that 50,000 Scoville Units is sustainable, even at the rate of 40 A.U. per molar/Dalton mass. That is simply inconceivable, and you cannot produce the data to refute it. Not ONCE have you proven your case on Free Republic.
Uh oh. I had a dream the skies were colored weirdly and burning.
” 530 Sieverts per hour, a dosage that would be fatal dozens and dozens of times over if a human were to be exposed to it.””
Conventionally, the sievert is not used for high dose rates of radiation that produce deterministic effects, which is the severity of acute tissue damage that is certain to happen, such as acute radiation syndrome; these effects are compared to the physical quantity absorbed dose measured by the unit gray (Gy).[3]
wiki
Ummm, actually they should have assumed that everything that did happen, would happen.
From this graph alone, it should be obvious to even the most casual observer, that the decay of -- for example -- Strontium 90 CANNOT BE explained by Hawking Emissions of any nature.
You are neglecting the spin.
“Not ONCE have you proven your case on Free Republic.”
You have never denied wanting to hit on RBG.
Why is radiation so damaging to a robot? Isn’t it possible to make a robot impervious to its effects?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.