I hope they plan on a lawsuit when NASA ignores them
Of course the majority of the papers did not reach a conclusion! It would be impossible to prove! Scientifically impossible. To propose otherwise is fraudulent. Anyone who comes down on either side and claims that their conclusion is scientific proof is a fraud
False scientists, but even if they told the truth it would stil
be wrong because common sense says other wise.
Long overdue!!!
The ultimate phony news story of this century and possibly of all time... The false narrative of Global Warming/ Climate Change and now as it’s commonly called... Climate Emergency fanaticism.
They need to keep changing the name of it because the more familiar people become with their soothsaying nonsense, the more they stop donating and paying attention to this money grabbing cause.
FURTHERMORE, the phony research ignores the issue of self-selection. In the 2000’s time frame, who chooses to do studies and write papers on climate change? Those who desire to show it, or those who desire to deny it? And which journals, even in the fields of science, choose to take on and publish papers from climate researchers? Journals sympathetic to AGW or those unsympathetic?
I have a friend who points specificially to the NASA website and its presentation of this 97% fraud as one of his reasons to be an AGW believer.
And by the way... the executive offices and the senior admin staffs and the public relations departments of federal agencies, the DoD, big corporations, and NASA are populated by those with spineless tendencies who respond to contemporary fashion and the loudest political fashion. Scientists did not put up this NASA website. Some executive staffer and some web flunky did. A bureaucratic politician and a weenie, not a climate scientist or astro-physicist.
Anyone that has paid any attention to 'man made climate change' knows that it is simply another communist scam to take other people's money.
In the 70's these same 'scientists' claimed that man made CO2 was causing the planet to freeze, 'Global Cooling'...didn't happen, so they claimed that CO2 was going to cause 'Global Warming' without explaining how that was even possible.
When that didn't happen, they now blame CO2 for 'Climate Change', which means they can never be incorrect, since we all agree that the climate changes every single second of every day... but humans have very little to do with it.
“So how did Cook and his team come up with the 97 percent number? They added up the first three categories (3,896 papers), compared them to the last three categories (78 papers) and the papers expressing uncertainty (40 papers), and completely ignored the nearly 8,000 papers that did not state a position.”
So a “paper” is a “scientist”? Among other things, that would seem to bias the results severely toward a select group who manage to get a lot of papers published.
Bookmarked. The repeated citation of this entirely phony claim is infuriating.
In other words:
They willfully and knowingly falsified official Government Documents, which used to be a FELONY!!