THIS is the part that got them pissed off:
It looks like they're STANDING on a dead Indian, right?
Here's the thing: Liberal San Francisco "educators" WANTED a mural that accurately depicted "the suffering of the natives under the settlers". So they got some pissed-off, professionally offended artist to paint THAT, and he did.
They got it.
THEN they were mad about what they got.
If you bought a bag of chips, then looked in your hands and saw A BAG OF CHIPS, would you be angry..?
And THAT is the dilemma of Groups of Liberation; do they want to thrive OUTSIDE the host culture, or thrive INSIDE it?
In most cases, they want it BOTH ways, and they rapidly switch back and forth.
Once you start accomodating that, there is no turning back.
I forgot to add:
They’re demanding that this mural now be painted over.
What is the COST of painint it over?
$60 —no, I lied.
The cost, they say, will be $6,000.
But I lied again..!
They’re saying just painting over it will cost SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS.
You think that’s a lie, right? Yet, no —an Environmental Impact Report is first necessary.
You’re reasonable, so you THINK that last part is a lie. BUT IT’S NOT.
The point of these games is to force people to lose... it’s a control thing.