Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gunslingr3

Still outside the range of ATC radar. The point is that radar sets do not track objects outside the performance envelope they are designed for. Fighter aircraft’s airborne radar is highly optimized to target other warplanes, “UFOs” would require IF bandwidths and tracking filter process noise that would degrade performance against targets of interest.


20 posted on 06/23/2019 7:42:09 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ( Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Still outside the range of ATC radar. The point is that radar sets do not track objects outside the performance envelope they are designed for. Fighter aircraft’s airborne radar is highly optimized to target other warplanes, “UFOs” would require IF bandwidths and tracking filter process noise that would degrade performance against targets of interest.


OK, you must know more about the new AN/APG-65 radar than the pilots that use them - and more than the SPY-2 radar people on AEGIS ships - as they would have the same problems you ascribe to fighter radar, yet somehow they can track them also - a conundrum.

Or your comment was not clear to me


33 posted on 06/23/2019 9:09:17 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson