I see no mention of Dan Boren in the article at all, so how does he figure in this as you claim?
1) The "Other" source that went into detail about it is verboten here at FR, period. Verboten enough that I'm not going to name it, I know better.
2) Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the deal with Boren, because it is dirty laundry and unhappy days for the Boren family for now reason number two... plenty of it, all available from various sources... having to do with money, political ambition and matters of the flesh...
3) Very bad turmoil at the NRA, all about personalities more than anything else.
I don't count myself in either faction, my loyalty and my justification for membership in the NRA is the Second Amendment.
Anyone who expects to stay in a job because "He's always been there", living very large on your/my/our donations, or anyone who's inclined to throw his weight around, however it's rationalized (like just hypothetically if someone is a prominent former military officer who just expects people automatically to be deferential to him no matter what kind of ugliness he instigates) to the detriment of the supposed greater cause, they can both go get screwed for all I care, and take everyone who's been involved in it with them. Even if they live within an afternoon drive of me.
Just start over if necessary.