Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bobalu
Any single sat would obscure a target for a mere moment...the proper software could remove the light trails and clearly reveal the underlying celestial image.

Not a very complicated problem IMO.

I was just about the say the very same thing. These days astronomers use CCD devices to capture long term exposures.

A simple program to shutter the CCD for the brief second that a sat passes by, and no streaks. The satellite flyover times are well known and predictable, so it would be a trivial exercise.

8 posted on 06/11/2019 3:19:56 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo; Bobalu; LibWhacker
Most rational responses I've seen on this subject.

Either real-time or post-exposure processing via computer makes this problem trivial.

However, depending on the frequency and number of transits expected within the field of view ("FOV") / exposure time, it might be better to blank the CCD for the full duration of each transit of the FOV, rather than "blink" just during object occultation.

Both approaches are matters of milliseconds...

That would negate any problem with intra-telescope reflections... And would eliminate any need for post-processing.

Much ado about nothing, IMO.

14 posted on 06/11/2019 10:04:04 AM PDT by TXnMA (Paraphrasing Adm. Farragut: "Damn the whines for 'impeachment'! Full speed ahead!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson