Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2019 9:02:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The author proposes that we look at the use of THORIUM.

Thorium can be used in special type of nuclear reactor which has been shown to be proliferation resistant and safer than the High Pressure Water Reactors (HPWR) which are based upon uranium.

Back in the early 1960s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) built a Liquid Fluoride-Thorium salt reactor (LFTR). The reactor was designed by Dr. Alvin Weinberg, who was the director of ORNL. The reactor operated without incident for a number of years before it was shut down by Congress in favor of fast breeder reactors and HPWR because each of these types of reactors produce weapons grade fissile plutonium and uranium which was in great demand because of the Cold War arms race.

The demonstration of the LFTR reactor was a magnificent success. It proved that LFTR types of reactors were safer than uranium-based HPWR in a number of ways.

Read more at above link...


2 posted on 06/03/2019 9:04:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
There's strontium and silicon and silver and samarium,
And bismuth, bromine, lithium, beryllium, and barium.

3 posted on 06/03/2019 9:05:02 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"The mining operations of the Chinese rare earth mineral deposits leaves behind huge toxic and radioactive waste dumps."

Wasn't it Paul Krugman who said we could learn a lot about economics from the Chinese?

4 posted on 06/03/2019 9:10:48 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; Army Air Corps

Thank You for posting.


5 posted on 06/03/2019 9:13:16 AM PDT by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The mining operations of the Chinese rare earth mineral deposits leaves behind huge toxic and radioactive waste dumps.

This is what always gets me about ultra-liberal environmental laws in the United States (which, by and large, are a good thing). Liberals are very happy to drive EVs and build millions of windmills, both of which use vast quantities of REMs. But they don't want the toxic effluent in the U.S., so they happily outsource REM mining and production to China and other third world countries with no or minimal environmental safeguards.

Whatever happed to their silly mantra "Think Globally, Act Locally"? If they were truly "Thinking Globally" and had integrity, they would refuse to buy ANY products that use REMs including Teslas and all "green energy" from windmills.

6 posted on 06/03/2019 9:14:23 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

P4L


9 posted on 06/03/2019 9:22:50 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The article isn't about thorium, it's about prohibitive regulations and costs in the U.S. that are nonexistent in the relatively unregulated PRC. The western U.S. has plentiful low/sub-economic REE deposits, but tooling up in peacetime, making the EPA happy, and making a profit in the current political climate is virtually impossible.
10 posted on 06/03/2019 9:24:38 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
More hand-wringing over nothing. China captured share in rare earth minerals due to their lax mine safety and environmental practices that artificially lowered their costs of production relative to others. They've paid a heavy human and environmental price for this "success", but of course the ruling party doesn't care about such details.

If China withdraws from the market others will step forward to offer supply. Yes, your iPhone might cost a couple of bucks more, at least for a while until fully robotic mining operations are put in place. So what. This threat will have zero real leverage against the US.

14 posted on 06/03/2019 9:30:21 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The U.S. is helping China build a novel, superior nuclear reactor
3/23/2015, 10:02:23 AM · by ckilmer · 27 replies
fortune.com ^ | February 2, 2015, 2:48 PM EDT | Mark Halper

The U.S. is helping China build a novel, superior nuclear reactor by Mark Halper February 2, 2015, 2:48 PM EDT Share icons The Department of Energy is dusting off one of the old betamaxes of nuclear technology: The molten salt reactor. But with political will lacking at home, it will rise in China.In 1973, the Nixon administration made a momentous decision that altered the course of civilian nuclear power: It fired the director of the renowned Oak Ridge National Laboratory, scuppering development of a reactor widely regarded as safer and superior to the complicated, inferior behemoths that define the global...


29 posted on 09/04/2019 5:14:08 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

REEMF Recently partnered with Synchron general atomics the only American owned domestic rare earth supply was $15 in 2011 might be a big deal. https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/americas/1576085150-us-military-to-sponsor-rare-metals-plant-to-offset-dependence-on-china-report PHUN 1.34 52wk high of $100+ insiders buying .. contracted to run TRUMP presidential campaign .. .. viva L.V. !


30 posted on 12/21/2019 1:33:34 AM PST by Therapsid (eagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson