Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek

Apparently Diskagna housed a photosymbiont responsible for some of the early oxygenation

Don’t plants require oxygen to metabolize in the absence of light? The net result is more oxygen than carbon dioxide, but they still must metabolize at night.


18 posted on 05/24/2019 10:16:09 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: gundog
Don’t plants require oxygen to metabolize in the absence of light?

Is that a question, or a claim? Because... Wikipedia is your friend!

The net result is more oxygen than carbon dioxide, but they still must metabolize at night.

If given a chance, plants would consume all of the oxygen they produce (during daylight, by means of photosynthesis).

It's because, on the whole, they don't get that chance - because they die first - that they yield a net plus of oxygen in the atmosphere. However, if heterotrophic organisms like bacteria, molds, insects, or human beings can get to them - i.e., if they aren't effectively isolated from the biosphere by being buried and locked into geological strata before they can rot, etc. - then all of that oxygen will be consumed by the organisms that rot or otherwise consume them.

Regards,

19 posted on 05/25/2019 12:04:24 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson