Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mfish13
They said it was 5 inch shells from a destroyer.

I can't imagine ship fire being this accurate. It is more likely 75 MM from Shermans particularly considering the concentration of hits near the aperture.

12 posted on 05/16/2019 11:13:57 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier; mfish13

Or maybe it was being subjected to engineering tests of German armor. Lots of reverse-engineering was going on to determine how good German armor was and how to defeat it.


14 posted on 05/16/2019 11:16:13 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

Oh yeah. The Navy ships came in close, in the shallow water to provide direct fire support.

They could hit that thing all day long. Besides, the supposedly amphibious tanks went straight to the bottom when they were launched, unfortunately with their crews, all lost.

Tanks didn’t make it to the beach on day one.


17 posted on 05/16/2019 11:21:39 AM PDT by OKSooner ("...cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war..." - Marcus Antonius, Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

I watched the Navy DDs work over Batangan Peninsula in VN in 1971.

They put shells on and around a hootch from a mile offshore.
We felt puny with our mere 50cal.


33 posted on 05/16/2019 11:43:23 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

That does sound plausible. I was just repeating what was written at a private museum on the exit of Omaha Beach. If it was destroyers, that is some shooting!!


60 posted on 05/16/2019 1:02:17 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson