No one is limiting freedom.
It is at best disingenuous and more likely dishonest to bring up an unrelated topic in a non-rebuttal while attempting to maintain a semblance of a dishonest point.
Marriage, whether monogamous or polygamous is still an institution designed to provide a stable social and economic unit in which to conceive and have those children raised by their two genetic parents.
It’s not about religion, it’s not about the worth of the person.
Its about responsible procreation and parenting. That is the historical definition and purpose.
And there is nothing honest, nothing ethical, and nothing moral about trying to change that definition and then disparaging people who don’t accept your changed definition as if they were maligning some one.
Marriage isn’t perfect, but it is by far the best way to provide love, nurture, and provision for children.
Anything between people that leaves conceiving and raising children out isn’t marriage.
1. I’m not dishonest because I picked maybe a weird place to voice my discomfort.
2. Your argument is all about the cons of gay marriage. It’s really not what I was talking about. I was talking about dumb childish insults on individuals who happen to be gay. And not seeing how it fits in with love of country, Gd, and freedom.