--------
All he had to do was claim he was gay
can I buy a vowel?
Now a massive civil rights suit must be filed to extract %$ millions in punishment for EVER fricking with our FREE SPEECH AGAIN!!
You are what you eat.
If I were the deputy I’d put a “Prosecutor Jones Eats P——-“ bumper sticker on my car.
Does he really want to be ‘famous’ that bad?
He spent money on lawyers all for this.
What does he do for a living?
I hope it has nothing to do with food services.
Free speech, yes, but I hope he was speaking metaphorically rather than literally.
It’s always Florida man.
What ever. The first amendment is not predicated on having any class. I honestly don’t care about other peoples’ sex lives. We all have one. I just would prefer that people show some sense of boundaries in their lives.
Don’t eat it! Just lick it, it will last longer.
“Dillon Shane Webb, 23, was informed by state prosecutors that the evidence against him does not warrant prosecution . . .”
Doesn’t the state prosecutor have a name? The prosecutor must be in the Jeff Sessions class - immobilized by fear of the liberals and media.
Why is it wrong to eat a donkey?
Maybe he’s into BBQ donkey?
It is quite obvious that the human brain is not fully mature until age 30.
I occasionally see a bumper sticker that says, “How’s my driving? Call 1-800-EAT-S-—” (without the dashes). It’s rude and offensive, and it bothers me that children in other cars on public streets will undoubtedly notice the sticker and read it. It wouldn’t bother me at all if idiots who put that sort of thing on their bumpers lost their driver’s licenses or some other suitable punishment.
Gross and disgusting. Most states have laws against obscene license plates, etc. However, I have always felt that the punishment is really delivered by public opinion.
When you see somebody with a bumper sticker like that, you know exactly what a jerk and creep he is. And I’m sure most women - unless he finds them under the highway overpass - would avoid him like the plague.
Avocado?
No right is unlimited. People should not place words or images in public view, especially where children are likely to be exposed to them, which are obscene, indecent, or profane. We have federal laws, in accordance with Supreme Court rulings, that prohibit these things on public airwaves:
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts
Why can’t similar standards be applied to images and messages displayed in public places?