I’m sorry, but Boeing used software as a cheap way to try to compensate for an inherent design flaw.
The aircraft is simply not airworthy. It’s natively tail heavy and the aircraft is in many ways significantly different from the preceding versions of the 737 that it should not be called a 737. I say that because a pilot who is used to a 737 is not going to be able to just sit down and drive a 737 Max without a lot of required training and without a lot of training on how to drive the thing without the MCAS.
What makes these aircraft so dangerous is that if they lose power the aircraft can’t be controlled by the crew in the same manner that a normal 737 can be controlled by a crew in a similar situation.
It’s not a safe aircraft and I will not get on one nor will anyone in my family ever set foot on one.
And you obtained this false info exactly where?
Oh Dear, I hope you can cook... Oh wait, that must have been s fairy tale, about trail heavy, right? Never mind.