Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PIF; stremba
I think his point is that the astroid is no longer a solid with a core - if correct, then as it enters the atmosphere it will begin to break up and burn easier than had it remained solid.

If it breaks up in the upper atmosphere, it will do less damage than if it stays solid enough to hit the ground, but that's still a lot of energy. Some of that will reach the ground in the form of concussion and heat, and you will have dust in the upper atmosphere affecting the weather for a long time.

The 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor was just 20 meters wide, and released the equivalent energy of a 400-500 kiloton nuke.

9 posted on 03/06/2019 3:49:38 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

A close packed fragment blast is not better than a solid mas ground impact. The down migrating shock wave would be more potent. A larger plasma plume would blast back to higher altitude. Line-of-sight for heat flash effects is extended.


10 posted on 03/06/2019 7:39:47 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson