Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rotten Tomatoes limits audience reviews after trolling on 'Captain Marvel'
The Hill ^ | 02/26/18 | Chris Mills Rodrigo

Posted on 02/27/2019 12:22:42 AM PST by Simon Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: mewzilla
For anyone else who's curious, a link from 2018, though the sale dates back to 2004. The current ownership explains a lot.

Rotten Tomatoes founder has a few regrets on selling

21 posted on 02/27/2019 4:13:40 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
America: Don't go Broke Being Woke!

Words to live by there Flick!

Thanks...

22 posted on 02/27/2019 4:35:27 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (Welcome to the Police State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Are they familiar with the Streisand Effect?


23 posted on 02/27/2019 4:59:21 AM PST by Haiku Guy (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Your correct it hasn’t been released yet. The comments are being driven by SJW comments made by the starring actress within the past few weeks. Had she kept her yap shut most of the blowback wouldn’t have occurred.

In addition RT specifically polled to see who was interested in seeing it. So there are comments in that regard as well.


24 posted on 02/27/2019 5:24:39 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

They’re voicing an opinion of something they haven’t seen. The movie’s not been released.


25 posted on 02/27/2019 5:27:23 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Oh, never mind. I didn’t know it was a “poll” until I read the thread.


26 posted on 02/27/2019 5:28:43 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pravious
Hollywood, when it’s not force-feeding viewers leftist propaganda, can’t seem to get much more creative inspiration than the nearest comic book. Then they churn out some movie with bright colors and loud sounds, like the stuff you dangle over a baby’s crib. Then they remake their pablum. Then remake the re-make. Then they hold awards ceremonies where they spout MORE leftist propaganda, pat themselves on their backs for their creative brilliance, and lecture all of us - before heading off to one of their multi-million dollar estates, or go off hunting for some starlet to ... ahem, introduce to the business.

OK that's just a really really good dis. No deductions. 10.0

27 posted on 02/27/2019 5:36:08 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Believing lies gets you killed by a lion {God} in the bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

>>“As a white male i dont think Brie would want me watching this movie,” user Nigel B wrote, according to Yahoo. “Larson has made it clear…men need not attend this movie,” user Joseph U said. Yahoo noted that such trolling on review sites has happened before with films like the all-female “Ghostbusters” reboot.

How queer they don’t have the quote where she says this movie isn’t made for white males, they should skip it, it’s for minorities and women.


28 posted on 02/27/2019 5:48:33 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Thanks for clarifying


29 posted on 02/27/2019 5:49:56 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

They will give a review that is all positive from now on as long as they are paid off by the studio.


30 posted on 02/27/2019 5:50:02 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

>>Black Panther proved they can make a ton of money and still be ignored. Nobody who has ever seen a movie in their life thought it actually deserved a Best Picture nomination.

A Batman movie is “rated” on IMDB as the third best movie OF ALL TIME.

Ratings are crap. Populist opinion can be faked.


31 posted on 02/27/2019 5:50:14 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

Got a t. Thanks


32 posted on 02/27/2019 5:50:44 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chipper

Thanks for clarifying


33 posted on 02/27/2019 5:51:33 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

>>Really hard to comment on a movie before its release

There are sneak preview screenings. Especially for fanboy films. packed houses.


34 posted on 02/27/2019 5:51:36 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Got it


35 posted on 02/27/2019 5:51:48 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
Rotten Tomatoes has lost all credibility as an honest, unbiased review website.

Rotten Tomatoes is just a shill company owned by Comcast and Warner Brothers. Rotten Tomatoes is ROTTEN TO THE CORE!

Their "reviews" and "ratings" are UTTERLY WORTHLESS.

I used to faithfully check out RT, but no more. They don't care a wit about the movie going public's interests or views. All RT cares about is selling movie tickets and taking our money while they tell us to "shut up and sit down".

36 posted on 02/27/2019 5:52:12 AM PST by Jmouse007 (Lord God Almighty, deliver us from this evil in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

It’s the last part of the hats key


37 posted on 02/27/2019 5:52:33 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

>>Commenting about a movie you haven’t seen yet is called lying, something we’re supposed to be against.

The Oscars don’t require voters to actually SEE the movies they are voting for/against.

Kind of like a chili cookoff where you looked at photos of the teams and didn’t actually eat any chili.


38 posted on 02/27/2019 5:59:10 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
"Larson has made it clear…men need not attend this movie,”

Well, she has a point.


39 posted on 02/27/2019 6:01:29 AM PST by Drew68 (No, as a matter of fact, I didn't read the article.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

>>They will give a review that is all positive from now on as long as they are paid off by the studio.

Sony was busted once upon a time putting their own reviews/reviewers in the “pull quotes” put on their newspaper ads.


40 posted on 02/27/2019 6:01:59 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson