Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Media_never_lie
Explain this to me please. Did the article use the November photo as a surrogate current photo as proof she is just fine, and returning to work?

YES. The journalistic standard is to say (File Photo) if the photo is not current. The NYT did NOT do this, but actually captioned the photo "R.B.G. returned to the Supreme Court on Friday"

15 posted on 02/17/2019 4:29:20 PM PST by montag813 ("This is Montag, Block 813...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: montag813

As if.


17 posted on 02/17/2019 4:30:56 PM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: montag813
The journalistic standard is to say (File Photo) if the photo is not current. The NYT did NOT do this, but actually captioned the photo "R.B.G. returned to the Supreme Court on Friday"


Then the photo violates good journalistic standards, which NYT has been doing for decades.

Most of their readers would not care. They are fellow progressives.

71 posted on 02/17/2019 6:53:19 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson