Posted on 02/12/2019 9:16:38 PM PST by zeestephen
Why, just a few years after a sweeping Supreme Court victory, did the Clinton administration agree to the Flores settlement? The stated reason was that the government was looking to finally put an end to over a decade of litigation that began in 1985....The settlement, however, seemed like a major concession by the winning side, and certainly one that could (and later did) crack the door open further for open-borders groups to exploit asylum laws for minors.
(Excerpt) Read more at cis.org ...
I think that conclusion is absurd.
The Clintons are, and always have been, political activists.
All I know is he treated the first attack on my beautiful Towers like a local crime with jail time for the attackers.
Or the second one may not have happened.
Almost 18 years already?? :(
I was only 31. Ready to conquer the world.
Showed up at work on 9/13 at Rockefeller Plaza.
Took 5 hours to get to work from Staten Island, walking over the Bayonne bridge and taking NJ transit to Manhattan.
Nice take.......the Clintons are sub rosa political activists. They never revealed their hidden agenda; they calculatedly hid behind it.
It sure beats how we treated the second one as an excuse to erode civilliberties and invade Iraq.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.