I am no Pelosi supporter in any way.
But in this case there is no “smoking gun”, any more than the innuendos in the “Russian Collusion” hoax. The only reason this old claim continues to bed brought back out is the “anti-Pelosi” theme it employs that resonates with we Conservatives.
But it is that ploy the web site is using to bring hits to itself. The story is not new and has no more legs now than it first did. Conservative researchers have had years to find Pelosi’s brother-in-laws fingerprints on the deal, and have found none.
Just because it has the anti-Pelosi theme does not improve the repeating of a story that has no legs, other than the repeating of “guilty by association”. If that is all it takes and if that is a standard Conservatives want to apply, then everyone has to watch out ‘cause hardly anyone in politics or government would be innocent.
“...other than the repeating of “guilty by association”. “
In the arsenal of political ammunition, one uses what works.
“...other than the repeating of “guilty by association”. “
In the arsenal of political ammunition, one uses what works.